Every "modern" Class D amp over the past 3 years or so touts the modernity of their circuits. Over or underappreciated? The jury is still out.
26 responses Add your response
What’s you’re problem buddy?
While you are (always) here to criticize others...where is your positive side?
Since you are so negative with your reactions to others’ posts...it would seem that you could have a fresh approach.? Where is that fresh approach?
Would you be happier, by not reading/posting here? Maybe try to be a positive influence based on your knowledge?
"Keep in mind, this is about perception, not function. The idea is that to sell a new speaker I have to convince you, the buyer, that you are buying something that is as up to date as possible.................... That I have something for sale others do not" I can't think of ANY manufacturer, of anything, that doesn't do exactly that, to one degree or another. It's how they stay in business! ie: food, clothes, cars, motorcycles, Big Pharma, the, "government" and it's presidential candidates' manufactured BS, etc
Maybe a better question is, in the last 5 years, have you seen any new feature, more modern thing really stick?
The closest I can come to this is how much better DACs have become after 2010 (or so). And I'm not talking about MQA. In general many products have come to market that sound so much better with Redbook than they did in the 1990s. I don't know why, but I assume it has something to do with better jitter reduction/timing circuits. Very accurate oscillators got really cheap.
Well, thinking back that far it would have to be power. Power cords, power conditioners, all of that. Even today a lot of people still don't know about this. Or even worse, some poor souls actually doubt it matters. Which means it qualifies as under-appreciated as well.
Especially since even now when power conditioners and power cords have grown from a tiny nerd niche to fairly widespread use, even now the vast majority still fails to include wire and power right up there with speakers and amps in system budgeting.
So yeah. Huge contribution. Has really stuck. And yet unappreciated.
Nailed it. What'd I win?
Some modern innovations are truly extraordinary, and some are near worthless. It’s difficult to separate the two, you have to be lucky and also have the ability to tell when someone is being genuine, or not. Sometimes you just have to try things for yourself and that can be expensive, disappointing or embarrassing. Or mindblowing.
I think EMF blocking coatings are the new frontier. Especially for audio cable technology, but also for many other audio related uses.
That's a rather odd observation from a guy who often insists others provide the results of controlled, scientific, double-blind listening tests.
" even now the vast majority still fails to include wire and power right up there with speakers "
The "vast majority" who enjoy this hobby, probable have a good reason for that. It's not that most haven't done some research or are ignorant to this subject. And most include some of these products, perhaps at a more modest price with good results. I'm not sure of the relative expense (wire to speakers) you are talking about, but (IMO) if you have good quality, basic power cables and the budget to upgrade, wire will not come close to better speakers. I understand if you do have problems with noise in your system, this must addressed first, but usually can be done at a modest price. Way more diminishing returns on wire than speakers. Cables and wire should be matched to your particular components, neutral and noise free.
Digital streaming is far and away the big area these days where products can be easily differentiated by the approach they take and features delivered.
Other than that, for the most part, there are more options for good sound than ever at more favorable price points. Good sounding products are more abundant than ever in general at various price points though some products offer clearly unique and novel value, for example, OHM Walsh speakers with their ability to expand the "sweet spot" for listening to the entire room.
"....... the audio rags, principally The Absolute Sound, started pushing imaging at the expense of tone." ???? What I recall and embraced, is some publications that, "pushed" realism(comparing what’s reproduced, to the sound of actual acoustic music, in a GOOD live venue) and trusting your ears, instead of clinical measurements. Imaging, sound stage(ambient info) AND tonality. NOTHING MISSING, from what was captured on a good recording. Of course, back when Edison developed his recording devices/methods, many couldn’t tell their playback/TONE, from the real thing, either. Some things just never change! https://blogs.loc.gov/now-see-hear/2015/05/is-it-live-or-is-it-edison/
I think computer audio changed the game and is largely still with us, even if the computer isn’t always a traditional one. Innovation and advancements in both hardware and software continue to push the envelope. Implementing digital is better understood and even now many are finding out just how good the old Redbook standard is. At for forefront now is streaming, which is simply an offshoot of computer audio.