Looking for a cd transport in the 5k range: Jay’s Audio CDT3 MK3 or Pro-Ject RS2T?


I wrote recently about a brand where I had both their transport and DAC which after a certain period of time could not be fixed. Kept breaking down. Spent too much money trying to get them to work. No dice. Refused to name brand because I knew thread would be taken down. Yet somebody guessed it shortly after! Astonishing.

So I need a transport and from comments on Audiogon it has come down to these two. Problem with Jay is they only have one dealer in Texas who does not return calls the PRO--JECT is easily accessible and 2k cheaper. It must be a top loader with an AES output. Just transport, No DAC.

Currently using th $500 SMSL(some prefer the Shanling) as a very good stopgap  but am looking for more resolution in large orchestral forces.

Anybody heard both of these and have any opinions?

Thanks for your help.

roxy1927

The Teac was originally $2699...   it then spiked to $3299 but can be found for $3k.  I was lucky and paid $2350 for mine last year.  

It is a great sounding player, unfortunately only has coax and opt out which may be a deal breaker for some. Sounds better than my Aurender N200 playing 16/44.k  material.  Its a great sounding transport. 

Maybe check out Metronome Le Player from the French high-end company Metronome Technologie. It's a top loader. I have their streamer and DAC which will be the last ones I will ever need. I expect the same for their CD transport. I don't know who distributes or sells them in the US, but worth to find out.

Teac/Esoteric/Tascam make the best CD drives on the planet period. Some one mentioned the Teac already I’d look for one of those or a used Esoteric. Even a Tascam with the VRDS drive would be a good buy as you won’t pay the audiophile tax.  From my understanding there is three companies making CD drives for CD players and another two making them for computer drives. So what ever you get is going to have one of those, regardless of the packaging. Teac/Esoteric is one of those three by the way,There is a reason many of the hi end CD palyers used Teac VRDS drives in them before Teac stoped supporting that market. 

@roxy1927 

Bottom line: for what you want to spend and given your concern about longevity, your best option still appears to be purchasing the Jay’s CDT2MK3 along with a spare drive. I know, you can't send it back but of the alternatives suggested here, how many of those are available with a return policy? Perhaps the Teac. But can you also get a spare drive for it? 

I have a Jay's CD3MkIII and a Teac 701t. I like them both and they sound very similar if not identical through a Berkeley Audio Reference II MQA. However, they are different in some important ways that you may want to consider. BTW I have not heard the Project transport but I didn't consider it due to the rreported problems.

I've had several transports and I expect these two to be my endgame. The single most important factor for me was the manufacturer of the drive mechanism. I had an absolute disaster with a PS Audio transport ($4k retail) that used a cheapo computer drive that repreadedly failed. Junk. I'll never make that mistake again.

Here are some considerations about both transports.

Jay's CD3MkIII

  1. Top loader. This may or may not be a positive depending on your gear layout. I like the top loading feature.
  2. The best Phillips drive ever made. It will probably last a lifetime but Jay's has an inventory of spares if you need one.
  3. Built like a tank and a joy to use. This piece of gear just oozes quality.
  4. It upsamples by 4X if you want it to do that. Depending on your DAC's filter scheme that may lead to better sound.
  5. The unit dithers the 16th bit and you cannot defeat this feature. This means that the transport will not decode HDCD disks (they will play fine but the DAC can't decode the HDCD). I have several hundred HDCDs so that's a problem for me. This is the reason I got the Teac as a second transport.

Teac 701T

  1. Front loader. Built well. Mechanism is quiet and smooth.
  2. My Berkeley DAC will decode HDCD disks and this trasport plays them no problem.
  3. The 701T will also play MQA disks (my Berkeley decodes these also). I have bought a couple dozen disks of this format and mostly they sound very similar to their regular counterpart but with some titles there is a big difference (improvement). It may be in the mastering but whatever - it's important to me to have this capability.
  4. The Teac VRDS drive is one of the best ever made and if yours ever fails they will have a replacement.

If I had to live with one of these I would go with the Teac because of the capability to play HDCD and MQA disks.