I don't want to sound like a crabby old fart, but precision in language counts! Upgraded vs. original is not the same as modified vs. original when you are describing a unit for resale or determining what you think its value is. At least to me, an upgrade is a change in the internals of a unit developed by (and in many cases done by) the manufacturer. Like the Vandersteen 3 to 3A to 3A Sig or a VAC Ren 30/30 to a 30/30 Sig. In my mind, the value of such units is increased as they are brought to more current designs and parts. The value of modified units may or may not be better, based on who did them, how well they did them, etc. While you won't get your investment back at resale, a unit modified by Dan Wright or SMc Audio will be more valuable than a stock unit. OTOH, we've all heard (pun intended) of backyard butchers who return units in less than fully functional condition, if they return them at all.
"Original" equipment vs. upgraded equipment
Hi,
I've always been curious as to why this is so important...at least to some folks? I've even seen one ad that stated: "born that way and not an upgrade". (Give me break.) As long as the equipment was upgraded by the OEM and brought up to current specs, what difference would it make, sonically or otherwise? Do people really believe that an upgraded piece of equipment is somehow inferior to a non upgraded piece? Can you hear a difference? Will it not last as long? Please do tell. Thanks.
I've always been curious as to why this is so important...at least to some folks? I've even seen one ad that stated: "born that way and not an upgrade". (Give me break.) As long as the equipment was upgraded by the OEM and brought up to current specs, what difference would it make, sonically or otherwise? Do people really believe that an upgraded piece of equipment is somehow inferior to a non upgraded piece? Can you hear a difference? Will it not last as long? Please do tell. Thanks.
- ...
- 15 posts total
At least to me, an upgrade is a change in the internals of a unit developed by (and in many cases done by) the manufacturer. Like the Vandersteen 3 to 3A to 3A Sig or a VAC Ren 30/30 to a 30/30 Sig. In my mind, the value of such units is increased as they are brought to more current designs and parts. Yes, the value is increased, no doubt, but not up to the level of an original Vandersteen 3A Sig or VAC Rev 30/30 Sig in your stated case. Look at what @oregonpapa did: I owned the REF-75. Replaced the KT-120’s with the KT-150 for a nice upgrade. When ARC came out with the REF-75-SE I sold the REF-75 and bought a new REF-75-SE. There is a reason for this, and I just did something similar. I just bought an original ARC Ref 5SE, and now have my ARC Ref 5 up for sale. It would have cost me another $2,000 to have ARC perform the upgrade to 5SE, and even then, they are only upgrading some of the internal parts (maybe 20%). When I am buying used items, I always get the serial number to look at the age and service history of a component. Eg: I would rather buy a 3 year old original component than a 7 year old component that was upgraded 3 years ago, as would most others. The 3 year old original will have more value on the used market than the 7 year old upgraded version. Bottom line: Updating a few of the parts doesn't make it equal to a newer unit. Hence the value of an original unit is greater on the used market than even a unit upgraded to current standard. |
The value of an upgrade has a great deal to do with who is upgrading it and the degree to which it is being upgraded. The upgrades I mentioned in my previous post involved new circuit boards, replacing the originals with upgraded capacitors, resistors etc. You need to discuss the upgrade with the upgrader and get to specifics of what improvements they can offer at what price point to evaluate the overall value to you, the owner, of that upgrade. |
Since ARC does a lot of model upgrades, let me tell you what they did that I found unbelievably unethical . It was in the 1990's; maybe they have abandoned the practice. When ARC discontinued the LS-2B MK.2 pre-amp (originally listing at $2995), their dealers were allowed to buy from the factory and then sell to their customers ARC's remaining stock of "Factory Reconditioned" units in sealed boxes for $1995. Great I thought, and bought one. After all those units had been sold, ARC sent their dealers the remaining stock of new (as opposed to "Factory Reconditioned") LS-2B Mk.2's. I found that to be lacking in integrity; how 'bout you? I felt betrayed and taken advantage of. What ARC could and should have done is offer both new and Factory Reconditioned LS-2B MK.2's at the same time, the Factory Reconditioned units at a lower price than the new. THAT would have been the honorable, ethical way to sell off their remaining stock of the discontinued model. I lost a lot of respect for ARC by them acting this way; how 'bout you? |
bdp243,300 posts When ARC discontinued the LS-2B MK.2 pre-amp (originally listing at $2995), their dealers were allowed to buy from the factory and then sell to their customers ARC's remaining stock of "Factory Reconditioned" units in sealed boxes for $1995. Great I thought, and bought one. After all those units had been sold, ARC sent their dealers the remaining stock of new (as opposed to "Factory Reconditioned") LS-2B Mk.2's. I found that to be lacking in integrity; how 'bout you I don't see anything wrong with that at all. |
- 15 posts total