AND WINE
- ...
- 41 posts total
@ronkent for 99% music you may want to consider the REL Carbon series as well. Not quite as big a footprint as the 31/32’s but integrates equally as well IMO. If I was going to do a 6-pack array this is the sub I would probably choose. And yes, for hobbies you are spot on although I would have to add golf in there as well. However, Golf differs in that there is less financial liability but higher frustration levels. I was fortunate to be able to retire early so I have way too much time on my hands. I find my wine consumption is directly proportional to upgrades in SQ. My wife now asks me to judge upgrades based on wine bottle %’s. Major upgrades are typically worth 1/2 to a full bottle whereas minor ones are only 5% to 1/2 bottle. She has always been more insightful than me!!! Best of luck in your decisions... |
I am 72 and i get the question a lot of when i am going to retire, and my answer i s always the same: "and do what, i don't play golf". most of my mad money goes to audio as it really is a never ending process. Thanks for the advice again on the subs. i am pleased with the sound i get but as I mentioned, always looking for ways to improve the SQ. the Carbon series would certainly be a step up from what i have. Thanks. Kent
|
ronkent, I'll preface my comments with there are no absolutes in audio, only preferences. I simply don't prefer REL subwoofers with passive radiators. My room is upstairs and no matter what I tried I could hear the passive radiator when I had dual REL Carbons. I initially liked the Carbons, but eventually sold them. I've owned several subwoofers...SVS Ultra 15&16, HSU, Martin Logan depth i, dual JL Audio F110s & F112s with CR1. I prefer REL No. 32s to any subwoofers that I've owned. I prefer them not necessarily because of the bass, but how they improve everything across the audio spectrum. Of course this is my opinion based on my experience. |
- 41 posts total

