Old Legendary tubes vs New Kids on the block Amperex/Siemens/Tele vs Psvane/TAD/Shugaung


Posting this on amps board, as pre tubes can make quite a dif on the amp ound. 
I just sent off all my oldstock tubes to a  guy who will sell them for me on ebay,,I am going all ~New kids on the block~ pre tubes. 
I am saying goodbye to my fav~ Amperex BB.s 
The only old stock i am keeping are the 2 tall bottle SQ Philips EC180's which will go in the AU section of the Defy,,i love the cool looking tall bottle of the EC180,'s, But i also bought some Psvane Au's , a sthey look quite impressive with taht double plate at the top,,,Will add some TAD AU's also on wish list, they also have thae cool looking double plate./high tech components.
I will roll the 3 labs, and see wich has the finer resolution/soundstage.
The 4 AX's will have to be the Shugaung, Maybe later on will add the TAD.
The cayin cd17 takes 4 6922's, for those I will go TAD, as they have the cool looking double plates. 
Which brings up this Q...will the old legends hold their top $ prices going forward, as folks begin cking out the new labs offerings, 
Psvane/Shugaung/TAD. 
I've not heard any of the new, as yet, I have the AU's/AX's arriving later this week. Since i sent all my old stock au/ax's off, can't compare to these new labs. Only compare from what i reacll the Defy sounding like  with Old stock. 
However as you guys know i still have that cheap chinese clone which is crippling the Defy's performance. 
The cayin SC6 is still a ways off, so a  true compare could only be made at that time. 
The cayin has 4 AU's, will roll both TAD and Psvane T series AU's. , Psvane has a  new ax out called T series,,,I will buy both the Psvane and the TAD, see which comes out for high resolution of fq's. 
Have you guys heard any of these newer labs, vs the old legends. 
On the power tubes, I have EH KT90's and also chinese KT88's i bought cheap off ebay,,so will roll those  when the front tubes arrive. 
Will not rebias the amp,,it will be a  justa  shortb 10 minute testing.
If I like the 88's over the EH90's,,I will add the Psvane KT88 C version to wish list, The C version is the newer KT88 from Psvane called the Classic 88, the older version is called the hifi 88. 
I will post notes over the comming year as these tests will be ongoing during the year 2020. 
What say you about these new kids on the block?
mozartfan
-markus
I prefer a neutral sound with an emphasis on speed and soundstage. The shuguang we6sn7 in the LTA sounds clear and clean, with defined bass. In my experience they sound similar to the NOS but bigger sounding. I could easily live with either but they have shown to be perfectly capable. On the flip-side, I have not had success with psvane 9 pin input tubes like I have with NOS.
Thanks for that.  

Next  question:

I often read about the need to let tubes burn in.  Shouldn't that guide our thinking and evaluation process to ensure the comparisons are fair? Not sure how much burn in is enough...
~~Burn In Theory~~ = 100% pure extra vigrgin Snakeoil. 
In my 40 yrs, never did i swallow one drop of that 
100% pure snakeoil. Tubes/amps/speakers etc, nada.
what you hear at 1st crank is what you will hear in 100 years from now.
mozartfan 
aka
snakeoil buster. 
+1 mozartfan! Burn-in is a clever marketing ploy to cheat the neurotic and gullible! Along with cryo treatment, fuses, power cords and AC conditioners!