Are you still playing CDs after, comp based syst?
It sounds like a lot of folk are settling for a computer based system and extolling its virtues, proclaiming the death of CDPs. It's only when I read reviews like this: http://www.stereotimes.com/ (on the Laufer Teknik Memory Player 64) that I realize said folk are settling for less. Granted, present day PC audio might be better than some, or most, CDPs out there, but there is still a long way to go. It seems there is much more to jitter than thought and what arrives at the DAC is far from perfect and the DAC can't reconstruct what is already riddled with jitter due to a host of things. Even standard memory players can't make whole what is damaged to begin with. Reading data, transmitting data, and converting data is not all there is to it, or so the designer of the Laufer MP would have you believe. Jitter is introduced at each and every step you can imagine. There is no perfect signal that is captured so when jitter laden data enters the DAC, no matter the pedigree, it remains there when outputted. At least that is what I got from the review. The price of the unit is right up there where I can't afford it but those who have heard it swear by it (so says the reviewer) . Does anyone here know of or have heard this player and is the article correct? It seems that some kind of reconstructing of the data has to be done AFTER going through a DAC. If this is so, then all bets are off and folk here are merely settling for something incrementally better. All the best, Nonoise |
Still getting mixed results comparing CDs with Computer based Systems- sound quality wise. I see no reason for either/ or contest between the two. Next Solar Flare wipes out all software for word processing, you are going to be hurting for that Typewriter. Computer Audio is flaky, fragile, susceptible to fragmentation, not to mention all manor of viruses/ malware/ spyware/ and magnetic fields. Despite this Computer Audio is still usable, but I certainly would use CD as a back-up. I have never had to back-up a CD. Music Files are disposable Computer trash, much like disposable lighters. Back-ups are only lipstick on this Pig. Sneeze and you would fragment half of your Music Files. They are only temporary, and certainly not made to last. They are only cheap, and inexpensive- not unlike magnetic cassette tapes! Remember those? A good magnet can wipe out both, how reliable can that be? |
"It seems that some kind of reconstructing of the data has to be done AFTER going through a DAC. If this is so, then all bets are off and folk here are merely settling for something incrementally better." There are a lot of designers that have tried to do this, but all so far have failed. There are technical reasons why this will probably never achieve the optimum jitter result. The best solution IME is still a low-jitter digital source, whether CD transport or computer interface, feeding a DAC with no reclocking in it. There are lots of poor digital sources out there, both CD transports and computer interfaces. The trick is to cut through the BS and find the best ones. Steve N. Empirical Audio |
