Transparent Audio cables are AMAZING!


I recently acquired my dream speakers, ATC SCM50. I've spent considerable time listening to these in different settings and I knew these were the right ones for me. When they arrived, I just plugged them into my existing system that I had designed for them, and they sounded, well, great. But not the way I expected. All the qualities were there but the tonal balance wasn't quite right. 

I figured tweaking location and toe in, balancing with my sub, and finding the sweet spot would resolve it but after a couple of weeks I just couldn't get it right. I always trust my ears so I started to consider what else to do. 

I was using the same Cardas Clear speaker cables that were in place. I thought a change in cables was worth a try but the idea of finding the right ones was daunting. I only had one other pair of cables. Transparent Audio Musicwave Plus, first generation from 25 years ago that I bought on impulse a couple of years ago for $150. I tried them a few years back and didn't like them in that system but I kept them. I also bought two pairs of the same model RCA interconnects in that same purchase that sounded great and have been using them since. 

I had to re-terminate the speaker ends since ATC isn't spade friendly. When I switched them out and listened, my jaw dropped. Not only did the tonal balance sound like I expected, but the sound stage became a huge holographic field I couldn't ignore. I don't have to listen for it, it's just there. The only thing that spoils it is opening my eyes and seeing my small room. 

It's clearly the best $150 I ever spent. Of course, now I want the next step up in Transparent cables, but for now I'm just thrilled to hear this amazing sound. 

 

mashif

Transparent Audio cables are AMAZING!

They did not work well in one system but then you needed jaw surgery after you put them up against Cardas in your current system.  Aha, a tonal balance change was observed.  Wow, what a surprise when a Cardas cable is in the picture.


One common theme/suggestion in these forums is that people suggest to use Cardas cables to add emphasis, more typically often referred to as, "warmth", 
which is essentially a rise in level in the lower-mid octaves.  This can be pleasing but it's certainly not tonal coherency.

Adding such a cable is often done to compensate for system shortcomings.
Remember turning up that midrange tone dial on your old 1970-1980s receiver?   Same bandage! Do I want to use a cable to do this?  Of course not - I need to identify the cause and resolve the problem in the system. 

There are a number of A'goners who think Transparent cables are superior.

Superior to what.....Cardas or Audioquest cables?  That comparison is a fairly low bar.

If you have a neutral, revealing system, Transparent cables have synergy

Ahhhh, that popular but dreaded synergy.  I assume that neutral here implies tonally coherent.  Synergy in these forums is typically used to compensate a system with tonal coherency issues with cables of complimentary tonal coherency issues.  "Your system has a tonal peak here so use this cable, and another tonal valley there so try that cable."  And then the match game starts over upon the next component upgrade.  Ugh, what a pain!  

If you like the presentation of tube product with a specific tube type, or fell in love with a phono stage, DAC, etc., then go all out to assemble a system of these qualities.  And then what's the logical thing to do in cabling the system?  .... find the cables that are tonally neutral so that all the work you did to assemble the system is not lost with tonally incoherent cables.  But sadly, this is only part of the focus.  There are also other attributes of equal importance: resolution, dynamic contrasts, 3D (decays, retaining harmonic structures).

There are a ton of great cables, your system dictates what tonal balance fits that particular cable.

Sadly, there are very few great cables.  Far too many praised cables in these forums do well in some areas and fail miserably in others.  The last thing I want is a full loom of any such cable.  And I don't want to play the synergy game and spend years mixing-n-matching cables of different brands to get a decent result only needing to have to go through this each time the system changes.  I did this for 15 years and no more.

Transparent MM2 Series is still relevant in 2026

Yes, true, but only starting with the model above the XL.  In the MM2 series, there is the Transparent Reference (TR), the Transparent Reference XL(TRXL) and the Transparent Reference MM2 (TRMM2).  The latter model is just below the Opus in the MM2 Series.  This is all very confusing, so one needs to look at the network boxes that show this clearly.  I worked with a TA dealer who sent me different models to try.  Only when I got to the TRMM2 in my system did instruments finally portray 3D and harmonics like I had been hearing all along.  The TRXL had the same tonally coherency but was dimensionally flat as a pancake.  And the TR was dismissed in seconds, it was horrible.  I still run the TRMM2 6m IC as I can't find another long IC at the performance level.

Transparent Audio claims that with each new product line, every model is "better" than the model above in the previous line.  That's quite a claim.  That means that the current Gen6 Reference takes on the TRMM2 or MM2Opus?   Hmmmm.  And look at the entry price of the XL or Opus models!

For all of you who are running the latest/greatest ARC based systems, and you are running with TA Ultra, Reference, or even likely XL, and you paid the prices for these that I can see from used sales the last 5-8 years, I could assemble the greatest ARC system from the mid 1990s, fully cable it with the cables I now use, and I would bet a steak dinner that this system would destroy the latest
ARC setup.  Now that's a jaw-dropper!

Another recent thread here discusses, can a cable have it all.

I don't want the MIT house sound, nor the Transparent Audio sound, I want it all: the low-level resolution, phenomenal harmonic structures, dynamic contrasts with tonal coherency an absolute starting point.

If you want to stick with a full loom from one cable company, cable lines current and from the not-so-distant past like Stealth Audio (Indra/Dream), Silent Source (Music Reference) and Kubala-Sosna (models above the Emotion) would all get my recommendation as they are all tonally coherent and retain much of the attributes that I experience in my system.

 

Unless your speaker cable gauge was too small to begin with, the cables didn't change the sound. At all. Your brain did. Enjoy!

Transparent makes some good cables. I feel the magic really starts at the reference line or higher. From the reference line up Transparent cable calibrates the cable for the gear it is connected to. And its just not tube or solid state. I have demoed the reference MM2  line speaker cables calibrated and non calibrate for my speakers and the calibrated, where noticeable better. So if you demo a pair of reference cables or higher, and its not calibrated for your gear you are not hearing them at their best.

Transparent cables at the upper end are extremely expensive and their website is lovely but it falls short in describing why the cables improve when you spend more money accept with fancy marketing language. Does anyone know what they're doing to cables on the higher end that causes them to be so much more expensive and presumably more desirable for some reason that escapes me.

I have transparent cables I don't remember which ones offhand. They were expensive and because I spent more money I felt better. And they sound very good. Which also makes me feel better.

I remember the power cord I bought from transparent came in a really cool suitcase.

68pete

Indeed, the magic does start at the Reference level to OPUS. Good ears!

 

Happy Listening!