Expanding the Class D Conversation: How Would You Characterize Their Differences?

@hilde45 - I think your initial post with its posed questions are fascinating, personally. Before going down this rabbit’s hole, I don’t think I would have been able to relate. But I’ve spent the last 6 years working remotely (which now feels like a bit like being under house arrest, but that’s another topic) and spending an inordinate amount of time streaming and discovering music. I have an office system, so my listening goes on throughout the work day too, albeit at low volumes with classical or jazz. 
 

During this time, musical reproduction through audio equipment became a fascinating topic. Of course the room acoustics plays an outsized role in all of this, as does one’s emotional state, etc. But equipment does sound different, especially when paired together in new configurations. Through the years, I began to develop a sense of all the criteria you’ve listed in the original post, but it wasn’t organized in my mind coherently. That said, I know I was listening for it. 

I’m still a newbie to this audio world and have yet to attend Axpona or similar events, which I’m looking to do in the future. I have visited lots of retailers and demoed and purchased equipment that I now have in my house. The class d discussion has a long history - predating my interest by a long mile. At the heart of the topic, at least in my humble eyes, is whether modern class d can deliver the emotional experience we ultimately want - are we moved by the music, does the equipment allow us to get closer to the performance - which I assume is how we all started down this addictive path. 

When I saw your original post, I couldn’t help but share my own recent experience with these AGD Audion mkiii amps. They’ve delivered on the emotional experience I have sought, but without having to worry about tube’s going out, or the inevitably issues they seem to bring. 

I still love my other amps. The Gryphon 120, in particular, still wows me on a daily basis. Just an amazing amp, as are they Qualiton and CJ amps. They are just a different flavor of joy. 

@hilde45 The Class D GanFet does not have a glare. This is version 6.5 of that amp.

The fact that I like the Meitner MA3i over the imersiv D-1 on the brand-new amp is not really indicative of anything yet.

I actually prefer the warmer CODA #11 over the CODA #16 on my big rig when using the imersiv D-1. That DAC is a bit of a unicorn.

Next week I should be getting the #11 back from CODA after a refresh. When I get the amp back, I will return the #16 to the office and compare side by side with the GanFet amp.

@hilde45 too broad a topic and too many variables  to summarize concisely in a useful way. Best to read up on any specific model of interest and go from there.  I can recommend using AI tools available to get useful summaries when comparing two specific products.  I find “web-search” in Poe App to be very good at this specifically. 
 

In general newer models will tend to outperform older.   The best I have heard tend to be newer (the technology is still evolving) and the sound tends to resemble the best tube or SS amps otherwise, but are smaller in size and way more efficient.  
 

Good sound hasn’t changed, only the options available out there to achieve it in various ways. 
 

"@fatdaddy2 A useless exercise."

"@fatdaddy2  We each have our own opinion as to "musical". The Crown amp was part of a 4000 watt home theater system involving JBL stage monitors and 18" sub. For HT use, the system made most visits to the theater superfluous, as the better sound was at home. It was never intended for use as a 2-channel stereo system amp, nor did I claim it was. Keep your snark to yourself"

.

A useless exercise vs. opinions to as to what’s musical are opposing points of view.

Thanks for the clarification your intended comparison is based on "home theater".  

Love my Gold Note PA-10's and my Canor AI 2.10 both check all the boxes, my class A-B tube amp sits collecting dust.