So much misinterpretation. I’ll quote the good Floyd Toole where he explicitly discusses his feelings on the importance of using EQ:
The full posting is below:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/an-enticing-marketing-story-theory-withou...
So, there we have it. Toole explicitly says that EQ is "almost certainly beneficial" for bass frequencies. Stop arguing that he said something else.
I’m done.
So, if one has a known neutral loudspeaker what does "room EQ" bring to the party? Above about 500 Hz, very little that is reliable - mostly general spectral trends; not detailed irregularities, for reasons mentioned in my last post. At low frequencies equalization is almost certainly beneficial and easily measured steady-state data are all that is necessary.
The full posting is below:
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/an-enticing-marketing-story-theory-withou...
So, there we have it. Toole explicitly says that EQ is "almost certainly beneficial" for bass frequencies. Stop arguing that he said something else.
I’m done.

