Reel to Reel uses -


My wife and I love to entertain.  It never ceases to surprise me how many will walk over to my stereo and stare at my Reel to Reel tape deck.  Some under the age of 35, will ask what it is? Others want to know why I have it, and what do I use it for?  Of course I answer their questions, but now it makes we wonder how others use their machines?  I have been following a couple of high end blogs that I really enjoy and see that one gentlemen uses his machine to play master tape copies.  I do this as well, but have no where near the selection that he does.  I make copies of my favorite LP's to play when guests are over, and also make my own master tapes using a couple of neuman's microphones.  I record small jazz trios and solo artists straight to the machine.  People are amazed at how 'real' these tapes sound.  My main reel to reel is a Pioneer RT-1050 high speed half track.  I have a second just like it that I use for the above mentioned site recordings.  I also have a ReVox B-77, a Sony TC-765, and a Crown 822, all half track machines.  Anyone out there making your own masters?

Norman
normansizemore
I don't have experience with R2R, or expertise to repair vintage ones. Reading positive reviews about its sound has me very intrigued, and wondering whether to join the club, and how.
There are good reviews about the UHA decks, heavily modded from Tascam and good to go. Are the UHA decks a hassle free way to enjoy R2R?
alectiong,

The UHA machines are fantastic especially if they are in your budget.  You can however find well maintained Otari's, Tascams, Pioneers, Studers,  for much less.  All of these machines will have the needed IEC eq  profile, high speed and half track configuration needed to play back master tape copies.  Some can be had for under $1000.00.  Even with servicing, your total would be less then $2000.00  This will give you a good taste.  From there, the skies the limit.  Be prepared, as I promise you've never heard anything like a master tape copies.

But there is more, tape your favorite songs from albums you enjoy, get a couple of quality mics and begin making your own masters!  Have a few favorite CD's?  Tape them, somehow they become totally listenable without fatigue.  I love analog tape and half track reel to reel is outrageously good!
Enjoy
Norman


Hi Norman,

I've only recorded direct-to-2 track at home (a very live environment) and at a lodge...another challenging acoustic space.  Cardioid capsules were used in either instance...haven't deployed the omnis, yet.  I'm still learning mic technique and placement! ;-)

Here's a link to Gordon Audio: http://gordonaudio.com/

Sam


Anyone using 1/2" machine for home listening?
Yes, I have a 1/2" head stack and listen to 1/2" tape. :-)
Thank you Norman. I will look around.
I read somewhere that tapes of LPs sound better than LPs. I wonder how that's possible, for the tape to sound better than the original?
alectiong,

Tapes of my LP's sound like the LPs. I don't think they sound better, but I have heard that before and I don't believe there would be a different unless someone is under biasing the tape and exaggerating the highs. 

N
c1ferrari,

Sam, I hate to ask but is there a huge difference with the half inch tape?  Are you running it at 30ips?

N
Half inch two track at 30ips must be spectacular, depending on the recording of course. This certainly should make vinyl obsolete.
inna,
I was thinking the same thought, but now I am wondering.  When I last worked in a studio they were using two inch tape for 24 tracks at 30ips and then mixing the masters down to half track quater inch tape at 15ips.  
I would imagine that if you were recording live to half track half inch there would certainly be an advantage.  It's silly, I don't even know where I would put another machine, but I can't help thinking about it. =)
N

I would probably have no other place but kitchen to put such a machine in and run the cables to the living room, which would be no problem. This is not at all silly, this is striving for the best. I wish more people were like that.
Sam,

Thanks for the link to Gordon Audio.  Makes for good reading with my morning coffee.  This is a much more elaborate way of recording live.  I have a small Nakamichi microphone preamp, and a small CRATE 6 channel board was well which allows me to alter frequency etc.  What I have really been enjoying are two Nuemans KM184's straight to the machine.  Excellent results.  

I recently seen someone recording with a couple of older Sony's that allowed you to alter the microphone pattern.  I am very interested in experimenting with this, since the Nuemans are cardioid only.


Norman
Sam, I hate to ask but is there a huge difference with the half inch tape? Are you running it at 30ips?
If I were recording "dense" acoustic music, I would try 1/2", half-track, at 30 in/s (haven’t had such an opportunity as of yet). I have some 1/2", pre-recorded, 30 in/s tape, on 14" reels that I haven’t listened to, yet. I know I have a 14" take-up reel...somewhere! :-)
Thanks for the link to Gordon Audio.  Makes for good reading with my morning coffee.  This is a much more elaborate way of recording live.  I have a small Nakamichi microphone preamp, and a small CRATE 6 channel board was well which allows me to alter frequency etc.  What I have really been enjoying are two Nuemans KM184's straight to the machine.  Excellent results.  

I recently seen someone recording with a couple of older Sony's that allowed you to alter the microphone pattern.  I am very interested in experimenting with this, since the Nuemans are cardioid only.


Norman

Indeed a pleasure, Norman. :-)

My ideal analog recording chain, at this juncture, are two Schoeps mics through the Gordon mic pre into a Studer.  It seems you've experienced this recording chain with two fine KM184's into your analog(?) recorder.  ;-)

Like you, I am encouraged by the sonic results.

I just need a terrific venue and musicians, so I can practice my mic'ing technique!  Haha :-)

Happy Holidays and New Year!!

-Sam
Sam,

Yes, I use the KM184's into the RT-1050.  I have also used them with the Crown 822.  Finding venues here in the Chicago area is easy.  Most will let you set and and record their performance, especially if you promise to make them a copy.

On one occasion, I was offered to plug directly into the sound board! The recording sounded superb and got me to thinking about maybe using one on a regular basis. 

Enjoy the holiday.

Norman
I just got my Louie Armstrong 15ips IEC tape from abc records and could not believe it.  I have St James Infirmary as well as Summertime (with Ella) on every medium you can think of and the best ever is the 15ips.  
Cerrot,

Is that from the abc records japan? The US company was purchased by MCA in 1979. I would  be interested in some abc titles.

Norman
China.  Yes.  Awesome selection.  www.abcrecords.com   (you will get a warning message as its china but it is  safe site).
I record CD and vinyl onto 1/4" tape at 15ips.  Sounds much better.  I reserve it for something special though.
inna,
I was thinking the same thought, but now I am wondering.  When I last worked in a studio they were using two inch tape for 24 tracks at 30ips and then mixing the masters down to half track quater inch tape at 15ips.  
I would imagine that if you were recording live to half track half inch there would certainly be an advantage.  It's silly, I don't even know where I would put another machine, but I can't help thinking about it. =)
N
I've read that 16 tracks on 2" sounds quite fine!  Norman, was the studio recording primarily rock?

Sam
Sam,
Yes definitely. They did have a 2" 16 track machine but that was in another studio.  The 24 track machine was an MCI, the 16 track machine was a Sony, but I don't remember which model.

I am wondering where you were able to find 1/2 inch masters, and who uses them?  I know that the old Studer 37 could be configured for 1/2 tape, but I think that was a four track machine.

Norman
Hi Norman,

Well, 1/2" masters/safety copies/dubs, etc. are catch as catch can!  From what I've read, 16-track Studer rec/rep heads are rather scarce.  An A827MCH outfitted with the aforementioned heads would be awesome!  :-)

Best,

Sam
topoxfordoc,

And this is why those old companies (Sony, Studer, TEAC, Pioneer, AKAI, Tandberg, Nagra, Otari, etc., ) need to get back to manufacturing machines again.  If they could build one that was economical enough, those who love the analog sound would purchase such a machine.  That and the continued availability of second generations masters is what is needed for this to work.  At this time, it's better than it has been in years, but new machines are needed for this to take off like LP's have.

N.
If you think of it, open reel deck based analog set-up could be far less expensive than those ridiculously overpriced record playing rigs. $2k machine should sound excellent, and it doesn't have to be made in China. Make them in Poland or Czech Republic if Germany US or Japan are difficult. Switzerland is certainly difficult.
Inna,

This is an excellent point.  Today manufacturing can be controlled and quality maintained alomost anywhere.  
Even without waiting for a new machine to appear, one can buy a quality used  open reel deck and have it refurbished for under  $2500.00 total and have an excellent sounding system.

As I was reading your post tonight I was thinking about the  two new second generation masters I ordered from abc records.  More titles coming online all the time.  


Back in the early 80's, an audio friend of mine who was also a jazz fan would record some of his rare out of print LP's to 15ips half track and send them to me for a listen. They are some of my most treasured recordings. I would likewise reciprocate when I came across a rare find. 

It was great fun and a wonderful way to enjoy music you would otherwise never be able to obtain. 

We should do that again.  As a community it would open all kinds of doors to great music. (Talking about stuff that's out of print).


Norman, that's a great idea. My friend used to do the same for me, though with cassettes not reels.
inna,

I know.  We should all be doing it. I recently came across a collection of 10" 33 1/3 lps.  Miles, Evans, Talyor, etc… I haven't listened to all of them, but every song on them is currently out of print.  

We should begin making lists of rare recordings!  I also have a pretty large collection of classical, even though it's my least listened too genre.  
I purchased it about 10 years ago, and have only gotten through maybe a third of the Lp's.  

Most of my LP's are classic rock and jazz.  

I have a hard drive with something like 64,000 songs on it.  It is a copy of a hard drive from a classic  radio station.  It's great fun.  When I think I might want to buy a classic rock LP, but I'm not sure if l will like it, I can actually listen to it first via the hard drive.  =)  I make copies and give them away as gifts.  Great for when your having guests over and need music in the back ground for hours on end.  

I would happily make half track recordings of LP's to share.  We all should.

Norman




I have a Tascam 32 upstairs for high speed half track recordings of my LPs.  The 45 RPM vinyl recordings can have you up and down often to flip the record, so archiving them to tape makes sense.  The quality is outstanding, but it eats up some tape.  I have a Teac 3300SX, half track machine downstairs where there is no turntable.  I can play the tapes there and get close to the vinyl repro quality.  I agree with the comments from folks that have never been exposed to open reel decks.  I would like to do some live music recording, but have not done that yet.

Mike
Mike,

I used to have a 3300SX. Fantastic machine.  Mine was super smooth.  I would imagine that your recordings are as excellent reproductions of your vinyl collection.  I actually do the same as you with my favorite vinyl.

The TASCAM would be a little better for live recording, as it has a little more headroom than the TEAC.  I believe the heads are exactly the same however.

You should check here for some second generation master copies.  There is nothing quite like them.     http://avshowroomsforums.com/showthread.php?5-Companies-Currently-Producing-15ips-Reel-to-Reel-tapes...!

Norman
Revox B77 mk 2 with IEC board, just got it. Like others have Opus 3 tape on way..collecting bits needed to record live..have access thru church to some incredible talent..blessed. plan is Ayre A to D then direct to drives so i can compare analog tape at 15 IPS to digital A/ B with minimal changes to chain....


love this thread BTW..thanks for all posts..
i may have sailed over the edge...

Tomic601,
You will love  recording with the ReVox. I have a B77 series 1, that I used to use extensively. Get a couple of good used mics to start with with and plug directly into the ReVox. You will be floored at how good a recording you can get with two well placed mics. 

I've never really cared for recording with digital. It's certainly easier and less costly. 

But don't stop there with the ReVox. Tape your favorite LP's, make mixed tapes of favorites. Even try recording your best CDs. You will be stunned at how they come out on tape. 

And certainly get get all the master copies you can. 
 Enjoy!
Norman
thanks Norman
The digital vs. analog experiment will be fun.
what are your top 5 mics to look for used and what do you use them for ?
tomic601,

You probably want somethijng with an omnidirectional pattern, or a mic with a selectable pattern. Used mics are a bargin and ususally the older the better.  Look for AKG, Audio Technica, Sure, Nueman and Sony.  They all made outstanding mics.  I usually go to a session with a couple of omni's and at least one directional, depending on crowd noise.  You can usually get good stereo and soundstage by monitioring one or two songs.  From there its just set back, listen and watch the meters.  
I have used boards in the past or even in some cases just plugged in to the exisitng souond board, but don't be afraid to just record straight to the deck. It's made for that and the ReVox has an incredible 24db of headroom.  Thats the highest for any consumer deck.
Obviouly running a 15ips is best for recording live.

Norman