Not exactly, but I have found the 35wpc PrimaLuna ProLogue 5 to work with reasonable success on my SCIII.A Dunlavys. Maybe not for headbanging, however.
7 responses Add your response
A friend has a the same or similar system with subs; however, he has settled on Parasound JC-1s, which are 400 watts a channel. He is a professional musician[ violin] who wants realistic sound so a lot of power can't hurt. I use a CJ 350 myself on 89db efficiency speakers myself; don't use it most of the time but it is there when I need it.
One year at the CES, John Dunlavy used a SET Bel Canto amp (sorry, I'm not familiar enough with them to identify model) to drive DAL SC-IIIs.
Stanwal, if your friend is the same as mine it is not a similar system. My friend has Duntech Princesses which, in spite of their efficiency rating do require significant power to perform their best. His JC-1s puts out 800 wpc into 4 ohms which is the rating for those speakers. I also owned a pair of Princesses for 19 years and can vouch for the match with the JC-1 amps.
On the other hand, from all I've read, the respective DAL models (different drivers and crossover from Dunlavy's Duntech models) are more compatible with lower powered amps so a quality 40-75 watt tube amp could be a nice match.
Pryso, I was talking to Carter last summer about a pair of SC IVs that were for sale and forgot exactly what he had; I know the Duntechs were suppose to be the better ones but didn't realize they were that different. I haven't seen any in person for years, just photos. There use to be a saying in auto racing that the only way to beat cubic inches was with rectangular money; that is creating a small engine to compete with a big one costs more money. There seems to be something similar in audio, the really good low powered amps cost more than a lot of big ones.