Some may find this pro sound take on the issue informative.
DACs, external clocks, and what's what
There seems to be more hype about DACs than about anything in this overhyped hobby. I'm considering a new DAC and have been dragged down this external clock rabbit hole.
It seems that lots of DAC vendors are pushing external clocks. Even high end DACs like Wadax studio player, dcs products, Master fidelity NADAC-C, etc., claim that an expensive external clock is absolutely necessary to reach peak performance. Others, such as MSB and EMM Labs-its owner, Ed Meitner, in particular, counter that the clocking function is best performed closest to the conversion so as not to introduce the inevitable issues-noise, etc., that can come with adding more cables and connectors to the process. Most importantly, they point out that the internal clock still performs the ultimate clocking function, not the external clock. According to this camp, a well designed DAC with a high quality internal clock cannot benefit from an external clock and the added box may even be a detriment in addition to a waste of money. Cynics imply its just a money grab.
I understand how external clocks can benefit professional setups where there are multiple components to consider. I have a hard time understanding the mechanism by which a simple, typical two channel dac would benefit. Both my dcs Bartok and the Studio Player are one box solutions. I've auditioned the Studio Player (no external clock) and think its really good. Also have recently heard the EMM Labs and Berkeley Reference 3P, all sound really good without an external clock.
On the other hand, these clocks are selling-even very expensive ones-and lots of folks say they hear a difference.
I'm certainly not a DAC designer. I think no one knows more about this stuff than Meitner, or the MSB folks, but this is quite confusing, at least to me. Lots of stuff in our hobby comes down to subjective preference, but this seems to be a case where one side must be right and the other is wrong. Which is which? If you think an external clock provides a substantial improvement, how so?
Just looking for insights and opinions from this esteemed group. Not trying to start a fight-just hoping to shed some light on this because its an important consideration in making buying decisions.
Thanks.
- ...
- 21 posts total
Is adding a clock a waste of money? Maybe, but one thing is for certain is that they do change the sound. Is it the clock or is it the other goodies in the box? You’d think that buying that $30K Refrence DAC would sound incredibly, but then the same company starts selling a matching $30k clock and a $30K power supply and you begin to wonder. |
@curiousjim +1 exactly. I don’t claim to know the answer, which is the reason for my post. But it does make you wonder when someone offers a $30,000 dac For sale but then says to get the best out of it you have to buy another $30,000 box that would seem to duplicate the clock function. On the other hand, some of these machines get rave reviews. So, as you say, it makes you wonder |
This explains it Hickory DACery dock, the price ran up the clock. The clock played one, the price ran down, hickory DACery dock. Hickory DACery dock, the price ran up the clock. The clock played two, the reviewer said “Boo!” hickory DACery dock. Hickory DACery dock, the price ran up the clock. The clock played three, the streamer played “Whee!” Hickory DACery dock. Hickory DACery dock, the price ran up the clock. The clock struck four, the listener said “No more!” Hickory DACery dock. |
I don't have an external clock but have researched this extensively. Jitter has been greatly reduced in most DAC's even cheaper ones. Many people are more interested in lower noise clocks with low phase noise (hash noise). Some companies DAC's are actually designed to reduce this phase noise. It's an interesting discussion for me since I plan on replacing my Holo Audio KTE DAC in the future for a better DAC. |
- 21 posts total