audphile1
Predictably Lame distraction and diversion! Why don’t you instead answer the question. My system is not the discussion point here and I really don’t require a critique from you friend.
Also I make no claims related to the superior performance of exepnsive USB cables, that has fallen to you. I just see the USB standard and accept basic requirement that this type of interconnect benefits from proper shielding, mechanical contruction keeping the length as short as possible. In this respect there are many reasonably priced cables that will be a match for these ridiculously priced, prettied esoteric offerings.
I choose whom I share detail with, depending on the level of engagement and open friendly discussion. Sadly that rarely applies to your comments on this forum, as it is quite apparent you prefer to devalue the opinions and views of others rather than engage in discussion.
Following many years working for Sony as a quality Auditor and development Engineer, my current industry is Nutraceuticals and Probiotics and my company correctly relies on peer reviewed published papers to support what we say and do.
I dont think it unreasonable to start calling these companies out, and putting the onus on them to prove what they claim. Some companies USB cable products cost $1000’s, they should front up and actually prove they do do make a difference. Or are they simply milking aspiring audiophiles? I strongly suggest the latter is true.
As far as I can research there are no double blind tests neither is there any supportive product measurement data. Instead there is plenty of meaningless hyerbole that they dont have to justify. Conversely there is quite alot of independent measurement data to support my assertion that their claims are mostly arrant nonesense as many here suspect.
Infact these companies rely on people like you to parrot the advertising blurb, convincing others that they are missing out. For instance, your comments endowing a simple data carrying USB cable with the ability to miraculously extract ’more detail’ from the data, or to be able to make that same packet data somehow be especially ’analytical’ is typical, at best its simple parroting, at worst its simply disingenuous and foolishly misleading.
Many here, despite an industry that is full of BS have saved and navigated a way to putting together systems that work for them and in the process have been persuaded to waste lots of hard earned cash along the way. I fall into that category but now I ask questions and challenge obvious falsehoods. Its sad that someone who has aquired knowledge chooses to use it so negatively.

