@bartsw wrote:
I would't disagree with the possibly of using HT speakers in this application. But I disagree with people using the term physics and science as if it's a complete equation.
Physics are a prerequisite that's typically left out - that's the problem. That's not to say it's all about displacement area, but it sets the stage for priorities that should be covered as a primary concern and what this means for the design implications.
A 12-15" HT driver can be room overload for many homes above 80Hz. Thus to get the most clean and beautiful sound for mid-range and music with the lease room mode, smaller drivers could be more appropriate.
When I said I don't consider drivers below 12-15" to be woofers from the perspective of the physics involved, it's also implying that midrange drivers should be somewhat larger than your typical 4 to 6.5" units (which again has design implications). Above the Schroeder frequency what exacerbates the reflective nature of emitted sound waves is a wider dispersive field from a smaller cone area, whereas a larger driver diameter and/or horn will narrow the dispersive field and thus heighthen the ratio of direct vs. reflected sound for less room interaction - an important aspect, if you ask me.
In addition a greater surface area from the upper bass into the lower to central midrange lends a much needed sense of physicality, commanding presence and ease in this region, but for drivers to be suitable for this it typically means woofer/midrange designs with higher efficiency crossed over to horns in the 500-1kHz range.
So, physics here is also about accommodating radiation pattern control and uniformity and how this affects the sound we perceive. Unfortunately many seem to be focusing on loudness and overpowering a listening space when larger speakers designs are discussed, while leaving out above mentioned.
If you have a well-designed speaker system of higher efficiency with prodigious air radiation area and where the driver sections sum at the listening position, while factoring in the above re: dispersive nature, I see a far more capable speaker outset than what would be achievable from a smaller, low efficiency package where mentioned parameters are harder, not to say impossible to come by.

