Sometimes I have looked back at my upgrades and the incremental improvements made. I don't know that I can say any particular component upgrade "made" the system, but each one did improve sound quality and/or presentation... especially moving up from Audio/Video receivers to a quality integrated amplifier. Then quality separates. Quality speakers are also important and I believe worth the investment, but they are also very personal. I wasted a lot of time trying some recommended speakers that weren't that good in my system. Fortunately I'm done now. Having said all this, my bedroom system is 1/10 the investment yet I enjoy it immensely when I'm in there.
The argument against upgrading
I’ve always assumed upgrading hifi can be worthwhile provided there is some audible improvement in sound quality. Maybe, this assumption should be challenged.
Let’s suppose I make some change to my system. I make a meaningful comparison that proves it sounds better in some way.
Before making the change, I was already able to get into and enjoy certain recordings. Surely, I can’t get into these recordings any more than that. It’s an either or thing not a matter of degree.
So what does the upgrade actually do for me in practice? I fear that more often than not it may be absolutely nothing.
I am not arguing that there is no better. Just that incrementally better may not necessarily always translate into more musical enjoyment.
I suppose this all begs the question what I actually mean by better.
What’s your view on the benefits of upgrading? How can we reliably assess whether it is effective?
- ...
- 114 posts total
- 114 posts total

