It Can't Be Explained Better


I just read this latest post from Dave Chesky at Audiophile Society, and I must  share it, as nothing I've read has better explained the phenomenon that may be behind the preference for vinyl playback so many of us have...

 

 

The World is a Bell, and it wants to RING!

Walk up to a piano, strike a single key, and listen closely. What you hear is not just a note — it’s a sympathetic vibration, a resonance that arises because the string naturally wants to vibrate at its fundamental frequency. The same happens with a guitar, a drum, a wine glass, or even a sheet of metal. Everything in our physical world has a resonant frequency, a natural mode of vibration, a note it wants to sing. The universe is, quite literally, a concert of ringing.
Audio reproduction is no different.


Your loudspeaker box is the most obvious example — a large resonant cavity with panels that flex and radiate sound in unintended ways. But it's not just the box. Your amplifier chassis, your cables, your digital-to-analog converter (DAC), even the circuit boards and power transformers — everything vibrates, and thus everything rings.


This became viscerally apparent to me recently in the studio while comparing linear-phase equalizers to minimum-phase EQs. Set to identical filter shapes, the sonic difference was striking. Linear-phase filters preserve phase relationships across the spectrum but introduce pre-ringing artifacts — a kind of temporal smear that occurs before the transient. Minimum-phase filters, by contrast, do all their damage after the transient, creating post-ringing that, while technically less "accurate," can feel more musically natural to the ear.


The ear can hear this ringing — not as an overt tone, but as a kind of blur, a clouding of the leading edge of a note, an inability to localize or feel immediacy. And this is just from a software filter. Now imagine the cumulative effect of every physical object in the playback chain doing its own version of ringing, from capacitors to cables, from enclosures to air gaps.


This may also explain why people still love vinyl. LP playback is, from a technical standpoint, riddled with flaws — mechanical noise, surface wear, channel crosstalk, limited dynamic range. And yet, it's emotionally engaging. Why?


Because analog never stops ringing. The cartridge, the stylus, the cantilever, the headshell, and the tonearm are all mechanical resonators that don't just start and stop. They sing along with the music. They fill in the gaps — not with data, but with sympathetic overtones and a kind of musical sugar that pleases the brain. There's a reason maple syrup and salt taste good together in the morning: we crave harmonic density. LPs, in a sense, continue the sound beyond the note — a sonic metaphor for warmth, continuity, and presence.


So what is accurate?


That’s the philosophical core of this discussion. You can measure a flat frequency response, perfect impulse behavior, or total harmonic distortion below 0.0001%. But no measurement can capture the cumulative psychoacoustic impact of all the materials, mechanics, and algorithms in your playback chain. The ringing, the resonance, the interactions — they are systemic and emergent, not linear or isolated.


The signal is not the music. The music is what happens after the signal passes through your chain of resonating objects and arrives in your emotionally perceptive brain.


So the question is not merely what is accurate, but rather:
What is beautiful? What is meaningful? What moves you?
Because in the end, the world is a bell — and it wants to ring.

- David Chesky

 

Thanks Dave.

audiodidact

I have a vague memory of Chesky and others , years ago, complaining about digital filters, that they caused ringing , and this was a bad thing.  This was before DACs routinely came with filtering options.  I didn't know what he meant then and I don't follow his reasoning as quoted in the OP either, but he seems to have embraced ringing.  Hey, Rachmaninov was obsessed with the sound of Russian Church Bells and frequently portrays them in his music; and there is always Mike Oldfield and Tubular Bells.

    I respect Chesky and clearly I am missing something here but the only ringing that I ever get in my systems is from my analog set up, in the high treble.  I probably could use either a new cartridge or phono preamp, as this doesn't occur with the digital sources in the same system, but when it happens it's unpleasant, and I definitely prefer it's suppression.

There is an ongoing vinyl vs. digital war . . but only one side is fighting it!  Why is it that vinyl enthusiasts feel so compelled to attempt justify their esthetic preferences?  I don't see digital users starting similar threads. 

With all due respect; added, random, untuned, non-synchronized vibrations are consistently sympathetic? Really?

If you want to understand the truth ounce in what Chesky said it is way over digital versus analog ... This debate miss the core of acoustic experience because it makes us focus on what music is not : a wave or a signal.

If you understand his description and metaphor as merely an opposition to digital by an analog afficionado only you will miss the truth of what he said which refer back to deep acoustics meaning explained here ( i own this book which is stunning material) :

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267327268_The_Body-Image_Theory_of_Sound_An_Ecological_Approach_to_Speech_and_Music

 

This quote from Chesky is explained in this article :

The signal is not the music. The music is what happens after the signal passes through your chain of resonating objects and arrives in your emotionally perceptive brain.

We cannot understand, speech, music, sound without informing ourselves about acoustics...

If not we will stay passsive consumers buying gear pieces by "tastes" for them (subjectivist) or worst buying them because ASR limited set of measures said so (objectivists) ...

 Then if the music is not the signal but way more (digital or analog) if it is not the  analog wave either but way more (sorry Chesky) what is it ?

Read this article ...

Acoustics rules audio engineering not the reverse...

@stuartk 

That’s a very odd statement to make.

I refer you to my post above. As I said vinyl and streaming both have their pros and cons. 

Discussing the sound of vinyl is in no way denigrating streaming. Yet every time anyone raises this subject, the anti-vinyl crowd bomb the thread waging the very war you are accusing them of fighting.