@daytrader +1 on “Sometimes the journey is more fun that the arrival” always! :-)
Love getting new equipment, hate the break-in
I get excited about new equipment but often get impatient with the break-in time. Some sound pretty good right from the get-go, others seem to take forever plus one day. Also, some gradually get better with time, others sound bad for a long time, like 200 hrs and then one day BOOM!, everything comes into focus seemingly all at once. Is your experience similar?
- ...
- 43 posts total
@sns +1 "Burn/break in is not a myth” -correct, burn-in (accelerated aging in semiconductor chips design) is a challenging part of circuit design process. Typically semicon-chips stabilize (flatted aging effect over time) performance after 50hrs burn-in. All involved components such as active devices, passives, and interconnects, degrade performance (age) accordingly to the stress conditions, such as voltage, current, temperature, humidity, sometimes mechanical vibrations. depending on design target, systems are designed for many years, typically five or seven years. |
@sns I think there is no use to argue with "roadcykler", he knows better than anyone. It is the fact. |
Burn-in is real, for sure. But it is in your ears/auditory center. That is referred to as habituation. I challenge anybody to do a blind A-B test with a burnt-in component vs out of the box. Good luck! Re capacitor formation/degradation etc., the question is, does it matter, is it audible? BTW: null hypothesis in statistical testing is "no difference". |
- 43 posts total

