What is Moving From Solid State to Quicksilver Mid Monos Like?


Hello to all!

I currently have a McCormack DNA125 modified / upgraded in a manor similar to what McCormack does.  It is fine sounding, but I have a curiosity (itch?) about what

I would experience if I moved to a pair of the current Quicksilver mid mono amplifiers.  Can anyone out there who has made a move from good SS equipment

to the mid monos tell me what they gained that made them happier with the sound?

Thanks in advance!

fastcat95

+! @decooney  I would also add the obvious, that the outcome of any SS vs. tube amp comparison will be dependent on the speaker used. 

@fastcat95 What are the speakers under use?

Hey guys!  Thanks for all the input!

My speakers are a pair of vintage Fried C6/L 2-way monitors (.75" tweeter, and dual V.C. 6.5" bass mids).  89 dB sensitivity; impedance probably drops to 4-6 ohms in some parts of the bass-mid range (to 2.7 KHz crossover); small to mid size room, and I do not play very loud (90-93 dB peaks at listening position - 2 meters).

What do you think???

 

I have owned those QS Mid Monos and used them with 83 db sensitive speakers with no problem. Those amps are a true value. I have never enjoyed solid state since. I am a QS fanboy and Mike Sanders makes gear that is built to last!!

@yogiboy which 83db speakers were you using with Mid-Monos?  Are they 4 or 8ohm?

At my 55year-in-business local dealer who sells AudioNote and Quicksilver, I've also heard low power 10w amps playing 83db speakers there which are 8-ohm. Sure the amps power the speakers to play sound, yet the dynamics, volume level and room filing sound capability was a bit constrained. 

 

@decooney I have used them with LS3/5a type speakers including Spendor, Harbeth, etc. BTW, all 8 ohm!