Indispensable Tool!


Here is an indispensable tweak that delivers on its promise! After a couple of passes, use Cut 3 every couple of weeks to "perk up" your system.

I'm in no way affiliated with Tellurium Q.

MacF

 

jmfinney

@czarivey Yes, you could burn the files to a CD. Or just copy them to your music library and then play them through whatever software you favor — Roon, Audirvana, etc.

On the recommendation of a friend, I bought and downloaded the Tellurium files in late 2022...because for $25, why not. With new speakers and new audio components, I tend to play track two on repeat for a few days / nights, just to limber ’em up, as it were. Seems efficacious but perhaps I’d hear the same difference if I played white or pink noise for the same amount of time — or if I played the Bunker Analog Stereo Test tracks.

Honestly, I’d completely forgotten about Tellurium’s file #3, the system revitalization track. Thanks to OP for the reminder.

For the last two days my system sounded a little closed-in, less lively than I remembered. I just played track 3 twice, at moderate volume. Now, with favorite recordings, there’s more sparkle, spaciousness, and aliveness.

Am I kidding myself? I concede I might be. But even if what I’m hearing is some kind of placebo effect, I am happier with the performance of my stereo system right now than I was yesterday or two days ago. I’ll take it. At $25, this is a cheap tonic for the ears/brain.

 

I love how people who support edgy tweaks compare themselves to the Wright brothers or Galileo. Those people had scientific knowledge they were applying to a new or newly evolving field. They were not just trying every suggestion they got from the peanut gallery.

It’s fine to talk about these things. It’s another to call everyone who tries to instill a little scientific sanity a troll. Did you ever consider that maybe the science and engineering oriented posters are really Galileo in this instance and you’re the ones yelling "burn the witch!"

Hyperbole added for effect. Just some food for thought.

For clarity, it is not my belief that just because something hasn't yet be scientifically explained that it is impossible. However then the burden lies with the theorizers to provide a scientific explanation or face skepticism.  I mean, do what you want, but don't attack other people who think it's silly unless you have solid scientific points to make.