Am I Better Off With Limited Low Frequency Speaker In A Small Room?
In my 12'x12'x11' room, am I better off with limited low frequency speakers, such as those which only extend down to 40-50hz, or will the mere introduction of a speaker that extends down to 35hz be potential for trouble (The extent of my knowledge is that lower frequencies need larger spaces to truly breathe, and the wavelength goes up exponentially). My listening space is my living room, and there's not a lot of space for room treament. I'm auditioning a single GIK Soffit bass trap. I'm not sure how much it will help.
I'm not a fan of subs. There can be a discontinuity in tonality. I have never heard one in a room where I didn't prefer listening to music without it.
I don't need the extension if the speaker goes down to close to 40hz.
By the way, I have the living room setup at an angle to the corner to reduce parallel walls. |
Yes, I think you are on to something. I would seek out a pair of stand mount speakers and forgo the sub. I have used a pair of Esoteric MG-10s (2-way stand mounts) in a small room for years. Frequency limit is lower 40s. I listen to rock (not heavy metal), jazz, vocals, folk primarily. Don't miss a sub. |
I did not realize that the listening room was that small (on your previous thread). You might take a look @ the Silverline Prelude Plus floor stander. I've listened to the original Non-Plus version and they were very nice, but our living room opens to a dining/galley kitchen area and the space was too large. http://v2.stereotimes.com/post/silverline-audio-prelude-plus-loudspeakers DeKay |
I agree with those who suggested smaller main speakers plus subs. Acoustic suspension speakers generally control bass better than bass reflex (i.e., ported) speakers. Also, my experience is that (at least) two subs can be integrated better than one. If the type of music you enjoy has significant low frequency content then I would definitely include the subs. |
