Streaming music comparisons and quality


At a 320 bit rate, what are recommendations as to which companies are best......I'm thinking MOG.
128x128brianpack
I would guess that MOG's catalog is 10 times bigger than Spotify's. I even found _my band's_ album on there, and I'm only famous among, well, me.

And it streams at 320 standard.
If you're using mainly mobile, MOG is an extra $5/month from Spotify's $5/month. I don't think Spotify broadcasts @320 to mobile.
Pandora's Genome technology is easily the best. No comparison. I agree with Vhiner; it is spooky how well the technology seems to always not only play the music I like based the on thumbs up/down input, but also in suggesting new music. But alas, not supporting high bitrate is what killed it for me. I tried and liked MOG but my workplace blocks it, so now I'm using Spotify. The extensive library and high bitrate is great but the Radio feature(supposed to emulate Pandora's Genome) really sucks. It always plays the same songs and plays a lot of crap I don't like.
I don't believe that MOG has any significant uphand on Spotify. I did a little research on the web. Anybody know for sure differently?

Here is the response I got from Spotify regarding higher resolution files:

The majority of tracks in Spotify are of a high-quality at 320kbps, apart from a small portion of our catalogue (less than 5%), which is currently only available in 256kpbs.

As for your mobile, 320 kbps is available under the setting of 'Extreme Quality'.

There's more on this here: http://www.spotify.com/help/faq/tech/codec-quality/

If there's anything else you'd like to ask us, just let us know.

Otherwise, have a... http://open.spotify.com/track/6Pi1WqBTTSjtl6BWHQSccH