Van Den Hul what is the best cart ?


I will probabely buy a van den hul cartridge, but regardless to the price, I don't know what to choose. My dealer says that black beauty gold 0.85mV is a very fine cartridge, but I read a lot of very fine reviews of the colibri.
And about the colibri what should be the best ? copper or gold ? 0.20mv or 0.30mv ?
I've got a VPI aries 3 + JMW 10.5i and for the moment a zyz 4D copper.

Thanx
andychris

@laynes You might want to consider posting your system in the Audiogon Systems section. Upon reading your posts, the first thing that struck me is that the DV20X2 is one of Dyna's more most models, and like 25% of the cost of the other two. Yes, both the Crimson & Hana should be in a different league altogether. However, you should be hearing a fair bit distinguishing them from each other. That leads me to ask about the rest of the system...

When I owned a JWM arm (12.6, 12.7 on a TNT6-HR), I found it to be very sensitive to VTA/SRA and was constantly adjusting it on almost every album. Gain and loading with those two carts may not have been optimized for one of them. The devil's in those details. If you share more info, someone here may provide you with a golden nugget or two that can bring out the best and the more nuanced differences between those two fine carts. Cheers,

Spencer

@nandric , how many people have you watched age over a lifetime? Not very many obviously. As JFK relates, "Old age is a train wreck." Nobody, and I mean nobody has the manual dexterity at age 80 that they had at age 24. Some are better than others. "Going Strong" for most 80 year olds is still breathing. Yes, I know some 80 year olds that are still running 1/2 marathons and I had one patient who at 84 could still dead lift 480 lb but these are the rare exceptions. The 84 year old had stopped working on his own cars because he was having difficulty with his eye site. 

Old age is something you have to cover up with humor and the sensibility to retreat from activities that have become to dangerous either physically or legally whilst giving up as little ground along the way as possible. You can't think about it, too depressing, just as bad is painting it as something it is not.

One thing I can say about you nandric is your mental capabilities are still going strong. Keep eating those jellyfish pills:)

@sbank , Trust me on this one. You have to get rid of those arms. The quality of your life will increase 10 fold. Angels will sing in your ears and throw petals at your feet. You might even get a massage (I would say with a "happy ending" but then the post will get pulled.) 

@mijostyn What's your problem...today? Don't imply I'm recommending those arms or anything else. 

Maybe if you helped the guy with a question figure out what's going on with what he's got instead of pushing your fav stuff, it might be a nice change for you and everyone else.

Merry Freakin' Christmas! 

Cheers,

Spencer

mijostin, The problem is that  everybody like to generalize. For this aim

the universal quantifier  ''all'' is used. The formula is

For all x Fx&Gx .  But if one x does not satisfy conditions F and G the

whole statement is not true.The most people have no idea what ''all''

means. It is not a name which can be put in ''subject place'' in an

sentence.

Dramatic  example is decision of European commission to decalar that

''all immigrants  have the right to asylum procedure'' .

This means that they had no idea what ''all'' means.That is to say ''how

many those all are'', The kids from 12 and on from all countries in

Africa and middle East who know in advice that they will never get asylum 

come to Europe wihch was their primary intention. Without any asylum

procedure they moved (walking) to the North Europe. Some countries

were willing to accept limited number , some not a single one. The result

is that all countries have much more ''illegal immigrants'' than ''legal'' .

Legal are those who are in asylum procedure. The illegal kind can't

be returned to their country because they countries refuse to accept

them. This whole drama is caused because the members of European

commission had no idea what ''ALL'' means.