Advice on dedicated room

I’ll tell ya what works for me:

My room is 19 x 29. The ceiling has a gable on one side and dormers on the other. The gable roof is 12 ft at the apex, 3 ft at either wall.

The ceiling is covered with 17” of rock wool. The walls have 6”. NO SHEET ROCK: I covered the insulation with fire resistant burlap. 
My 3,000 book snd 6,000 LP library line some of the walls. 

The floors are plank hardwood. I cover the floors almost completely with throw rugs. Only four small windows: blankets cover the windows in the dormers during listening.

This has given me a fairly dead, semi-anechoic room. The acoustics are superb. Most people notice immediately upon entering the room the difference in how their voice sounds.

The room was added to my system three years ago. My system has otherwise been the same for 36 years. The room lifted the overall quality to a place where I don’t feel any need to be looking for a anything else to make it better. I sit back and enjoy the music.

My room was designed by a Cooper Union/Harvard trained architect (and friend) who came up with this concept with a classmate who is a “sound scientist/architect”.

The Square shape of your room is a problem. I would put a wall in to create a 4.5 ft wide room along the length, and put your equipment in there, and your record library in there (yes, I’ve made an assumption there, but whatever). 

@ronboco, the concrete walls are not bad as a surface inherently.
Concrete is damped / well damped ( below grade ) but very reflective.
The entire audible spectrum will be reflected making diffusion and absorption more important.
Addressing the low end with the ISO wall is a very good idea and find out how much benefit can be expected. If drywall is put up then damping the resonant areas behind the finished wall would be important.
The concrete walls help with sound isolation as well. 

2x6...definitely 

I would not add a wall reducing the limited space you have. It is entirely possible to treat the room and have superb acoustical performance, even if the room is a perfect cube. The idea of building a new wall to provide non parallel walls I would also dismiss. Having a changing dimension will not remove problematic nodes, just change them for different ones that still need taming.

You have what can be considered a small room and as such needs absorption more than dispersion. Absorption must take the form of broad-band construction to be effective. The often recommended: 'just add a rug/curtain/bookcase etc. are only narrow-band absorbers and although they are better than nothing they will not reduce the decay sufficiently across a broad range of frequencies. You mentioned putting a 45 degree angle on 2 corners: that is where you could/should fit bass traps which will greatly improve the room's performance below the Schroeder Frequency. Strongly recommended.


A suggestion is to buy a microphone and use the excellent free download REW and measure your room. This will take the guesswork out and provide solid evidence of what any added treatment is doing and also help find the optimum place for any sub/s.

@lemonhaze, I disagree. I think it is better to make the room as good as possible, and then treat it. But then, my crystal ball has been busted for some time now.