Do I NEVER shut it off…?

@bpoletti 

Your are correct that science and math are not political. What you wrote is against the accepted science, which was pretty much settled 20 years ago. The manner of your dogmatic assertion is political, and the antithesis of science.

Again, please leave your politics at home.

For the record, both of my advanced degrees are in math and science. It's Dr. if you like.

Accepted science doesn't mean it's true. Their are many scientists that disagree with the accepted science.

Not this science.

@terry9

"Accepted science" requires proof, not conjecture. Science and the scientific method REQUIRES healthy skepticism, not blind acceptance. (Think of how dangerous pharma could become without healthy skepticism and hard proof.)

Every man-made climate change prediction has failed to materialize. The only observable climate change is more minor than predictions for natural cyclical climate. And far less severe than the Hamptons and Florida Keys underwater by 2012, ice caps gone by 2014.

The last I read, less than 20% of ALL scientists believe man-made climate change exists. I can think of no mathematicians that have reviewed the published work that

So the conclusion can ONLY be that man-made climate change MUST be political since it is not supported by science or math.

@terry9 

You said "Not this science."

That is NOT science.  NOT the scientific method.  ALL science must be subject to skepticism, and observed data.  Just because a narrative fits a political agenda does not make it science and immune to review.