Do I NEVER shut it off…?

@ asiaaudiosoc7 - 

1) Could you please cite examples of amps burning down residential houses.  Provide links for articles specifically noting the cause of the residential fire that destroyed a home was a high end audio amplifier.  

2) There's no need for excuses for leaving the amp on if it improves sound quality.  That's the entire point of having better equipment.    

My Herron M1 amps have been on for years.  I only turn them off if I'm going on holiday for more than a week or if we're having electrical work performed on our home.

All this bs about energy consumption is not based on ANY science on this planet at any level or any narrative. 

Are there any rational people that actually believe that something like climate change could actually be caused by man?  That is so stupid and disproven by years of research, mathematics and physics that it make all the climate terrorists look stupid.

Do the science and math if you think otherwise.

@terry9 

Science and math is not political.  Going against science and math is political.

I'm tightly aligned with science and math.  With which group are you aligned?  

@terry9

"Accepted science" requires proof, not conjecture. Science and the scientific method REQUIRES healthy skepticism, not blind acceptance. (Think of how dangerous pharma could become without healthy skepticism and hard proof.)

Every man-made climate change prediction has failed to materialize. The only observable climate change is more minor than predictions for natural cyclical climate. And far less severe than the Hamptons and Florida Keys underwater by 2012, ice caps gone by 2014.

The last I read, less than 20% of ALL scientists believe man-made climate change exists. I can think of no mathematicians that have reviewed the published work that

So the conclusion can ONLY be that man-made climate change MUST be political since it is not supported by science or math.

@terry9 

You said "Not this science."

That is NOT science.  NOT the scientific method.  ALL science must be subject to skepticism, and observed data.  Just because a narrative fits a political agenda does not make it science and immune to review.