Are the new Ohm Walsh speakers Audiophile quality?

I'm still working on getting the most out of some new Ohm Walsh 3000 Tall... All I can say is if you are sitting relatively close to them the 3000's are too big...  the 2000's would probably work better for my room.  

I plan on getting a room correcting DSP because my room is just terrible with all kinds of reflections.  Also, the bass is good if these are against the walls.  I use a subwoofer though so I am going to split the bass with a miniDSP at somewhere between 80 and 120 HZ.

I'm still surprised that I prefer my old much cheaper ELAC Debut 2.0 F6.2 for a lot of songs.  I think my lesson is that in a room that handles reflections well, the Ohm Walsh are probably better.  Otherwise, a pair of very directional speakers can work miracles with weird room size like I have.

Regarding the ohm design:

If you took any two channel speakers and pointed their drivers down toward the floor, would you not in effect fill the room with music without being able to point to the source, blind folded, so to speak?

Could be.  Try it and see. Some designs aim their drivers up down and all around trying to achieve that effect.  See the Ohm I, a predecessor to the Walsh CLS design for an example. 

I had the OHM I for 39 years and had the drivers up graded. I loved them but the Walsh is a more modern design and I will keep my 5000,'s

Stringreen (a year ago), a friend had the early Ohm A's, in 1972. It was the most clear-sounding speaker I had ever heard. It was about as big as a small refrigerator, each. Then Ohm held a world premier event of that first Walsh speaker, not too far from my home.

After hearing my friend's A's, I wanted an Ohm A someday for its sound and because its operating theory makes sense. No crossovers, time accurate. I wound up settling for the Ohm F, a more affordable and more practical Walsh speaker. Still have Ohm Walsh speakers today, after several upgrades.