Just spoke to an old client of mine..........Avantgarde owner


This gentleman is unhappy with his Avantgarde Trio XD, because his current room is smaller, and he is hearing the discontinuity, between all of the drivers, from his listening seat. I have been stating this " phenomenon ", for as long as I can remember. It is why many designs, imo, are a poor choice, for the average sized listening room. Not just this, but my ears are very critical with designs, that have a conventional woofer, along with a horn, or panel type, midrange / tweeter. These designs are known as Hybrids. I hear this discontinuity, every time. As a horn guy, as much as I can enjoy some horn hybrids ( a simple and well executed design, such as the Altec 19, and yes, I owned a few pair and made mods to  several ), I find I cannot, long term, hear a convincing presentation. Bass, up to the crossover point, is so different, than the horn. This of course, is a very personal thing. I am a Klipsch guy, and love the KPT series, along with the Jubilee, but I have been involved in arguments with folks, who think I am crazy ( here, and on the Klipsch site ), about using speakers of this design, in a regular and average sized listening room, where the distance to me, is just TOO DAMN CLOSE. This Altec and the Klipsch designs I speak of, are of two different phenomenons.This is me, and I never attacked anyone who enjoys this type of set up, but I have been questioned ( even attacked ), by individuals, who seem clueless, to what my ears hear. Just wanted to put this out there, and will be presenting some discussions and experiences , I have had, and want others feedback. No right or wrong in this, as we all hear differently, want things differently, and so on, which I also stated, many times. Enjoy, be well and stay safe. Always, MrD.
mrdecibel
Basically I would avoid any 3-way design in a room where you can't sit far enough away for the drivers to integrate, regardless of the type of drivers.

I am forced somewhat in to a fairly close listening distance - between 6 1/2 to 7 1/2 feet from the listening position.  (Currently at 7 feet).

So maintaining coherence at a close seating difference is paramount in my speaker choices.   My Thiels do great given their coaxial driver array, and one reason I chose my Joseph Perspective speakers over the Devore O/96s I was going back and forth on, is that the crossover/driver design of the Josephs are superb for maintaining coherence over varying listening distances, where the Devores required at least 8 feet to truly cohere.

Generally, pretty much every speaker I've owned has been quite coherent for my listening distance.
(I'd love to try horn speakers, but my situation makes those a hard problem).

Dynamic drivers almost always have trouble properly mating with different driver types. Worst I have heard are the Sanders electrostats in this regard although I clearly hear this often with horns as well. 
The Cornwall’s do a fair job until you hear a real horn bass cabinet but they give up some low end. my Thiel 2.3 are awful in the near field but lovely farther out......

what model avant g ?
My Tannoy Dual Concentrics are pretty coherent. It’s nice initially, as if something less is happening, but it’s funny how quick you get used to this effect. I guess the reverse wouldn’t be so easy.

Last year I heard some Monopulse active speakers and whilst far from perfect, they were so, so ridiculously easy to listen to even whilst playing back a stream from a laptop. Again, as if something overly busy but normally present was missing.

Their designer Allan Hendry has been on a mission to integrate driver coherence for decades.

Anyway, your friend must be suffering to have such fantastic speakers and not be able to enjoy them fully. I heard a pair some 15 years ago on the end of some exotic vinyl system playing a 1950s jazz recording and they remain the only pair of speakers I’ve heard that had that spooky imagery.

And yes, it was in a huge room. It had to be due to their sheer size.