Dear @atmasphere : "
I used to have a Graham 2.2. I tried using a Grado wood body cartridge in that arm and encountered something called the 'Grado dance' although this is not something that is a particular fault of Grados (which are a great cartridge) or for that matter the arm.
This was simply because the arm mass in tandem with the suspension of the cartridge.........."
Any one that owns an unipivoted tonearm design has very low knowledge levels on the tonearm/cartridge overall issue and you are not an exception to that. Good that you are improving about.
All unipivots no matters mass cartridge always " dance/jump " inside the grooves generating higher tracking distortion levels than non-unipivot tonearm designs.
Not only Triplanar but any gimball tonearm design handled that problem in better way but can't avoid it completely even if the resonance frequency between the tonearm and cartridge is in the 8hz/10hz-12hz " ideal " range and exist only one posibility to put that groove jumping out of the " equation " or at least at minimum.
Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.
Any one that owns an unipivoted tonearm design has very low knowledge levels on the tonearm/cartridge overall issue and you are not an exception to that. Good that you are improving about.
All unipivots no matters mass cartridge always " dance/jump " inside the grooves generating higher tracking distortion levels than non-unipivot tonearm designs.
Not only Triplanar but any gimball tonearm design handled that problem in better way but can't avoid it completely even if the resonance frequency between the tonearm and cartridge is in the 8hz/10hz-12hz " ideal " range and exist only one posibility to put that groove jumping out of the " equation " or at least at minimum.
Regards and enjoy the MUSIC NOT DISTORTIONS,
R.