I understand where you are coming from I remember when CDs first came out. I didn't like them. I much preferred cassettes. I honestly still do now CDs sound so much more clear and no static but it's just not as good. Everytime I put in a cassette or listen to an album of old they just sound right. Digital sound clear and high quality it just doesn't sound right lol. I can't pinpoint anything as being wrong its just missing something. I don't see the point in today's digital HiFi as you have to spend so much just to get to where a record was. That doesn't mean I don't listen to it because I mostly listen to streaming on my phone lol it's just to easy and fast lmao. Anyways I do get where you are coming from.
to my ears digital audio does not sound natural? something is wrong!
lf Digital audio is man made how can I expect the brain to recognize it as natural sounding?
lf I re-encode digital audio with the earths natural frequencies will the brain now recognize it as a natural source allowing the digital audio to harmonize with my brain creating an entirely new listening experience?
This might sound crazy however it sounds perfectly logical to me so i went to the park at 3am to record the frequencies of nature using the built in mic on my cheap mp3 player in wav 16/44 and uploaded the wav file to my pc and while the file from the park was playing on my windows media player i made a simple copy of a commercial digital album flac 16/44 on my desktop and here are the results using the same audio source.
commercial release flac 16/44 http://u.pc.cd/PmXctalK
commercial release with earth frequencies http://u.pc.cd/7d7
lt may be the placebo effect and i'm hearing what i want to hear however i think the music is now in harmony with my ears?
lf I re-encode digital audio with the earths natural frequencies will the brain now recognize it as a natural source allowing the digital audio to harmonize with my brain creating an entirely new listening experience?
This might sound crazy however it sounds perfectly logical to me so i went to the park at 3am to record the frequencies of nature using the built in mic on my cheap mp3 player in wav 16/44 and uploaded the wav file to my pc and while the file from the park was playing on my windows media player i made a simple copy of a commercial digital album flac 16/44 on my desktop and here are the results using the same audio source.
commercial release flac 16/44 http://u.pc.cd/PmXctalK
commercial release with earth frequencies http://u.pc.cd/7d7
lt may be the placebo effect and i'm hearing what i want to hear however i think the music is now in harmony with my ears?
- ...
- 67 posts total
+1
jjss49 It's common knowledge that as you move up the audio food chain, digital audio sounds better. Trying to make a statement about all digital audio systems based only on a single sample of a relatively (by high-end audiophile standards) low price/performance component is meaningless. The OP too general a term "natural" is not an absolute, but a subjective judgement. For instance, as one moves up the digital audio food chain, there will come a point where some will say it sounds "natural" while others would disagree. Also, how would I know if we injected some "tube magic" into the digital audio chain whether it would satisfy the OP "natural" requirement? |
Sam here and i had to look up who kenjit is? still not quit sure.i'm not trying to get new age as i have never been new age.l believe that the music we listen to even on top notch systems somehow falls short and if i find the right formula there can be a supernatural experience between the listener and the music. based on the two audio samples from my post i believe i proved that frequencies can have a pronounced effect on the sound of music.when i use the term natural what i really mean is a supernatural connection to the music something man made equipment can't produce.l believe there is an answer and i believe it is a very simple answer i simply have to uncover it. |
- 67 posts total