Bits Are Bits, Right?


So I'm currently heading down the path of exploring which CD-Rs sound best in my CD player, along with what burn speeds sound best and what CD burners make the best CDs. I already know from my research that the more accurately the pits are placed on the CD (e.g. less jitter in the recorded data), the better chance I stand at getting the CD to sound good. There is a counter-argument to this idea that goes something like this: "Bits are bits and as long as the CD player can read them, the accuracy of the spacing doesn't matter because everything is thrown into a buffer which removes the effect of any jitter written into the data during burning." I know I don't agree with that logic, but for the life of me I can't remember the technical reasons. I know I used to know. Haha! 

So who here knows why buffers don't solve all of our problems in the digital realm? How come timing accuracy matters in the stages before the data buffer?
128x128mkgus
Tidal through a good streamer and dac can be very pleasurable for sure. Don't be fooled otherwise.
Some years ago (maybe someone can help with the brand?) while I was working at a HiFi factory, we had tested AudioXsell audiophile grade CD-R
which not only sounded better than any other discs we’d heard (including HDCD and SACD) but they also played on my stubborn car player, which liked to only play purchased manufactured music CD not burned.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/8d/e6/f5/8de6f5d6a5b54520b3bd213d587dd7b0.jpg

Yamaha did make an external audiophile SCSI CD grade burner [F1], which was pretty darned slow, but it surely was the absolute best burner, made specifically to be configurable to have less turns on the burn. Effectively broadening the width between data on the disc.