LP made from a digital master recording...


The digital vs. analog thoughts, even debates I can understand...when the analog LP is from analog masters.  When an LP is pressed using a digital master recording as the source, does that LP still have an analog advantage?   
whatjd
The mastering engineer's vision of the finished product is a big deal.

I wouldn't be surprised if he/she was making different choices for LPs. Certainly happens with different releases of CD's as well.
mijostyn
... DACs recreate the analog signal from digital data. If I show you both an analog 100 Hz waveform and one from a DAC they will look exactly the same. There are no on and offs, no steps.
That may be  counterintuitive for some audiophiles, but it's absolutely true.
Monty's demo illustrates this.
@gpgr4blu I look at it the same way.  I like music and only hope it's recorded, engineered and mastered well no matter what format it's served up in. 
I took this image in analog studio in Helsinki in 2004 on 35mm film.

The way it used to be when you’re in analog studio. You can’t imitate STUDER digitally, live music must be recorded this way (on tape, multi-track) then vinyl release is a pure magic. It depends on the genre of music, but when we’re talking about Jazz, Soul, Rock i can’t even imagine digital recordings, it wasn’t there when the best stuff was recorded. Magnetic tape is a part of this music. Everyone who wish to be authentic in these genres normally record on tape. Some people/musicians simply can’t afford their own analog studio or can’t properly play to record in one take. Digital is easy to edit and this is why digital recording exist in the studios (imo). Analog is superior and every recording engineer can explain why.

When it comes to sound quality, to me it's more a matter of the recording's label and producer than the choice of recording technique or the media through which we access it.  I gotta say, too, that I love some of my old Telarc LPs.