Class D Technology


So I get the obvious strengths of Class D. Efficiency, power output & running cool which allows for small form factors. I also understand the weaknesses somewhat. 1. Non-linear & lots of distortion that needs to be cleaned up with an output filter. 
So my question is, if it weren't for efficiency & power, would there be any reason to own a Class D amp? Do they beat Class A in any other categories that count for sound quality?  
seanheis1
Please let me know if you want, I’ll post in Tech forums for guru’s to respond.
Tech advise needed, Apogee Scintilla in 1ohm mode which amp?

Krell FPB-600c or is there any Class-D you can recommend to equal the Krell?
And yes even any of the ones you just mentioned would be fine, why weren’t these mentioned instead of just the tube ones you tried before, as they had no chance, and you should have known that.
Cheers George
READ my first post George. It was talking about MY FRIEND’S H2O Class D amps with his Scintillas in challenge to your statements trashing all Class D amps as inferior as if there was no difference between them.

I normally do not need to qualify my posts with details of my system. I felt it to be unavoidable in this case.

Why would I need opinions of "gurus" when I have actual real-life listening experiences regarding this exact subject?

Best to you George,
Dave
I used the DR-25 and Krell with my Apogees for years before trading for the equally-difficult-to-drive Thiel CS-5i’s.
I assume that you had the same seeing you compared them to your friends.

Why would I need opinions of "gurus" when I have actual real-life listening experiences regarding this exact subject?
Because the ones I would ask, you’d have difficulty in dismissing them as well. Just ask and it will be done.
Cheers George
but nobody talks about phase shifts.
I do and all the time. The ear can't hear phase shift in single notes, but over a spectrum it can hear phase shift in a variety of ways- as a tonality or as a change in the soundstage. The engineering rule of thumb to prevent phase shift is to have bandwidth exceeding the highest frequency to be amplified by about 10 times.

Now that is generally interpreted to be a bandwidth of 200KHz (but might be higher- for example nearly all LPs have bandwidth well past 30KHz in record and in playback; usually this is limited by the source tape or file or the microphones themselves...). However you need the bandwidth in the playback electronics even if the source lacks the bandwidth if you expect to reproduce all the phases correctly! We get that out of our amplifiers but to do that with class D is still a bit of a trick. We are barely getting switching speeds much past 250KHz which means true 200KHz bandwidth isn't there yet.

Now the AES says that if you can get about 2 octaves above the limit of human hearing (80KHz IOW) that you are doing OK for a monitor amplifier. Audiophiles routinely operate gear that has performance in excess of that. And one of the things I don't like about many of the class D amps I've heard has been the lack of speed and spaciousness on the top end. Like mapman, there's no way my hearing is as good now as when I was in my 20s but I still notice this stuff nevertheless.

So if you're going to get that 200KHz response you need a switching speed of around 1 MHz and even then its going to be a bit spotty (2Mhz would be much better). There's no problem getting the converters to run that high. A prototype we're building here in the shop can do conversion at 3MHz easily no worries (the chips we're using have a bandwidth product of about 50MHz). The real problem is the switching speed of the output devices (and whatever junk occurs between the output of the converter and the inputs of the output devices...). If one were to spend the extra cash to get the really high speed stuff then one of the primary advantages of class D goes away real fast: low cost/high profit margin. Really fast, powerful switching transistors aren't cheap and you don't see them in 99% of all class D amps! So to compete against traditional solid state and tube amplifiers in a nutshell Class D has to improve bandwidth, and you don't have to be a bat to appreciate the difference.

This is one reason why class D is still a rising star. Its also why some class D amps are quite diss-worthy and others are not too bad. 
Atmasphere why does 200khz bandwidth matter if there are no sources practically (record or CD res digital) that can even come close to delivering it today?

Seems like a purely theoretical argument.

I agree and have stated on many occasions that higher bandwidth alone is better theoretically all other things aside and Class D can still get much better there.   It certainly cannot hurt  assuming it is done well/right like most things.

But practically I am less sure. I expected my Class D amps to not sound nearly as good as they do given the theory. I’m glad I did not let that stop me from trying because it seems to be a non issue already practically, at least for me.

Thanks.