MIT continued experience

"07-06-15: Jafant
any of you guys using MIT cabling w/ THIEL loudspeakers?
I would be interested in reading about the synergy (if any)
and your listening impressions/thoughts?"

I would be careful. Since the signal leaving the network box is different for the highs and the lows, I would be concerned that this would have an effect on the speakers time and phase characteristics.

That's not correct. The components in the network boxes are wired in parallel with the signal cable. One of the points of having a network box is to have correct signal(s) at all frequencies.

"07-07-15: Psag
That's not correct. The components in the network boxes are wired in parallel with the signal cable. One of the points of having a network box is to have correct signal(s) at all frequencies."

Then why do they label the outputs on the network box high and low? Are you saying that both outputs are the same and it doesn't matter how you connect them?

Zd542
The MIT has multiple articulation poles across the frequency range. As you go up the price range you get more articulation poles. These are points where the phase, time and energy settling times are congruent. I would assume that in the biwired versions the high frequency articulation poles are in the upper and the lower frequency articulation poles are in the lower. If you hook them up the wrong way round the cables will not operate optimally. If you do not have biwired speakers you simply hook both the high and low together.

The network boxes for some of the the MA-X series cables have separate adjustments for high and low, but the outputs are not labeled as such.