MIT continued experience


Its been a while since I've seen an MIT thread here. I've been slowly replacing my former cable loom with MIT Oracle MA and MA-X cables. With every change, I feel that MIT brings something special to the table. I'd be interested in any thoughts from people who have experience with other cable brands in addition to MIT.
psag
"07-07-15: Psag
That's not correct. The components in the network boxes are wired in parallel with the signal cable. One of the points of having a network box is to have correct signal(s) at all frequencies."

Then why do they label the outputs on the network box high and low? Are you saying that both outputs are the same and it doesn't matter how you connect them?
Zd542
The MIT has multiple articulation poles across the frequency range. As you go up the price range you get more articulation poles. These are points where the phase, time and energy settling times are congruent. I would assume that in the biwired versions the high frequency articulation poles are in the upper and the lower frequency articulation poles are in the lower. If you hook them up the wrong way round the cables will not operate optimally. If you do not have biwired speakers you simply hook both the high and low together.
The network boxes for some of the the MA-X series cables have separate adjustments for high and low, but the outputs are not labeled as such.
Thanks for the info. I was told years ago, when I had MIT cables myself, that you couldn't combine the outputs, and had to use the cables in a biwire config. But that was from my dealer, and not MIT.
The day I took the MIT's out of my system (and replaced them with cables without network boxes) was the day I went from having speakers playing beautiful, wide, articulate music to....People with instruments in my listening room! That's all I'll say.