Isolation Cones vs Cheap Cables


I'm posting this here for I didn't want to hijack a recent thread on cables and the title is a little misleading.

It was suggested to a member that BDR cones offer a lot of bang for the buck compared to cheap power cords when it comes to "making an impact on sound".

I'll buy into that concept!

I was looking reading about BDR cones and it seems like a lot of folks place three of them under a speaker instead of four.  I'm going to purchase some and have to ask the question:  Why three cones and not four?  My floor standing speakers are about 48" tall and the base is only about 10" wide.  I gotta think that using three cones with my speakers would make them top heavy.  Yes?
malatu

Showing 6 responses by millercarbon

Of course carbon fiber is soft- it is in fact a fabric. (Here's a clue: carbon FIBER.) CF is used in composites, a class of materials that when combined and bonded together have unique properties. Carbon fiber composites can be exceptionally light, or stiff, or strong, or flexible. Its all in the composition and construction, which is why they're called composites. The properties of "carbon fiber" have little to do with carbon fiber itself. Its all down to the way its used.

There is no carbon fiber in BDR Cones. They are exceptionally stiff, strong, and highly damped. They improve dynamics, both macro and micro, lower the noise floor opening up a wider deeper stage, and create a very natural open sound.

So in other words, every single detail wrong, and that's just the ones I'll bother to mention. Thank you, Captain Irrelevant.
Millercarbon, what are you using as Round Things? I notice you have the the words capitalized. Is "Round Thing" a brand? My google of the term couldn't find anything specific to a brand. What are they and what additional purpose do they serve, isolation redundancy and additional stabilization and balancing of the component?  


Yes Round Thing is a brand. BDR began with DJ Casser as Black Diamond Racing making carbon fiber parts for America's Cup racing boats. Being a perfectionist audiophile he took aim at vibration control and developed everything you see in my system today.

But then he went and got cancer and died fairly young which just about killed the company. Apparently the family or someone is still making a few things today, but it seems only the easiest to make which is Cones. All the other stuff was extreme precision and absolutely gorgeous. After building my turntable and seeing how good it sounds there was a time when I thought about trying to manufacture turntables. So I went around showing a Racing Shelf (what he called them back then) to several fabricators and composites professionals in the Seattle area. Every single one of them was in awe. Well that was 30 years ago. Today Porsche has almost that level quality in the engine compartment of their Carrera GT. Imagine what DJ could have done if he had lived.

He started with Cones and the Shelf and then developed a whole series of Things, first square then Round as he learned that not only the material but its shape and dimensions determine its response to and control of vibration. Some are threaded to attach a Cone or attach to a component, some are dimpled to keep a Cone centered, some are threaded on one side dimpled on the other. Round Things are big, about 3.5" dia, Pits are smaller, all the same idea just one is better for bigger gear.

My Talon Khorus have 4 Cones screwed on pointing down and sit on 4 Round Things. Round Things completely eliminate the hassle everyone struggles with and spends a small fortune on trying to move big heavy speakers around on carpet. What a joke. Look at my system pics. My speakers are precision to zero of an inch. One nudge they move what you want and stay put.

Four is totally better than 3 and you will hear it. Its funny to think back 25 years, there was nothing, absolutely nothing, anywhere close to BDR.

Use 3 under components because as I said 3 points define a plane and therefore will be stable and not rock. Four however and no matter what anyone says is more stable. They have confused stability with the need to shim if a hard surface isn't absolutely flat. 

You will want to experiment with placement both because they work even better in certain locations but also because many things mass isn't evenly distributed. Transformers are heavy and so one end or corner is a lot heavier than another. 

Placement technique, for this or anything like it, slide one under the heaviest corner or side first. Lifting this way is stable as the lighter side is supported at two corners. Then lift one of those corners and slide a Cone under. Then do the last corner. Slide them around to where it seems most stable. Listen. Then if you're really ambitious try another configuration. But transformers vibrate, its inherent in their design, and they are massive, therefore the greatest benefit is to have a Cone close by to control that. You will see. 

How these things work, the biggest obstacle to understanding is clearing your mind of all the misunderstood gobbledygook everyone is peddling about isolation. So let me start with that.

Forget about speakers and turntables for a moment and even CD players and think only about amps and power conditioners and things like that with no moving parts. These things all sound better on a good cone or rack, but why? It can't be environmental vibrations. I proved this myself quite by accident. Was doing a demo for a friend and kept the music playing the whole time. Yeah I do a lot of things different than your average audiophool, like none of the repetitive OCD playing the same thing over and over again. So anyway I lift it to remove the Cones and my friend says the instant I raised it in my hands he heard the sound collapse.

So think about that for a second. Because its awfully hard to find better isolation than holding in your hands. Your skin and tissue is soft as sorbothane, softer even. Your muscles cannot move faster than a few Hz, which is exactly what we struggle to design vibration isolation parts to achieve. So its isolated in your hands about as good as its ever gonna be. And it sounds bad. So its not isolation.

Its vibration control. Controlling or tuning vibration inherent in the component itself. Being isolated in and of itself accomplishes nothing. The component still generates vibration internally, and the whole thing becomes this vibrating mess. Which is a mess, because almost no one outside of turntables and speakers pays much attention to vibration control. Well I notice Raven uses solid billet aluminum and brass and stainless steel screws, Herron uses thicker circuit boards and casing, its not like nobody knows anything. But by and large its a low priority, if its a priority at all. 

Now let's look at speakers, where this is even more true and obvious. Imagine a speaker somehow absolutely isolated, floating in air. You've got this Star Trek anti-gravity thing or whatever. Its exactly where you want it to be, only its floating free of every physical influence in the environment. Got it? Okay.

So now you play some music. The speaker drivers start moving back and forth. Remember your physics? Newton? Not theoretical make-believe word salad physics, actual action reaction physics. The physical reality where when you push against something, something has to push back, or you go nowhere. Those drivers are pushing against their mass, and also the resistance of the air. 

It should be pretty obvious this isn't gonna work very well. The more massive the speaker the less this is a problem, which is one reason all the really good speakers are massive. (With the exception of ESLs, which some guys like, but we're too long already to be going into that now.) Making the speaker massive however is only mitigation and moving the problem one step down. Ultimately regardless of mass vibrations are being produced and need to be controlled. Its vibration control, not isolation.

All these different BDR products do this really well because they are very stiff, relatively massive (dense), and have inherently high damping factors. Its the mix of these 3 properties that makes them so excellent. Too much of one, not enough of the other, and you have something else. If you have something else then sure enough you can't use a lot of it like I do without screwing things up. Come hear my system, I can guarantee you will not be saying I screwed it up.


This past March I got the hankering to hook up my turntable. I quickly went down the rabbit hole and here I am. Aside from a new system I converted our sun room into a listening room and yea, I even bought a couple of White Hot Stampers! Next are power cords and room treatments. Does it ever end?

Probably what a lot are thinking by now: Does it ever end? Yes. But the quest for better sound? Never.
You've tried both, numerous times? Both BDR Mk3 and Mk4?
Or neither? I think what you mean to say is you've tried lots of OTHER cones and fewer was better. Right? You just forgot to mention you were talking about something different, right? Just want to be clear. Because we aren't talking about other inferior round pointy things called sones or spikes. We're talking about BDR Cones. Which you've tried... how many?
millercarbon would throw all his BDR cones in the trash if he ever heard DH Cones which are about ten times harder than carbon fiber and five times better. Millercarbon is an excellent example of what happens when you get carried away with something. Before you know it you’ve got them under everything. I implore you, gentle readers, wouldn’t it be a lot more logical to explore all available cones before committing to one brand or type? 😬 I won’t even mention isolation. 😀

I don’t often respond to Captain Irrelevant because its such a waste of time. But every once in a while its nice to point out just why he earns the name Captain Irrelevant.

1) There’s no carbon fiber in BDR cones. Irrelevant.
2) Hardness. Irrelevant.
3) Explore "all"? Impossible.
4) Isolation. No such thing.  

Still no system pics I see. If you would be kind enough geoffkait to hold your phone up to a mirror and take a pic to show everyone your system, then we can all decide for ourselves just who should be throwing what in the trash.

Anyway, can anyone offer some real world experiences of the two versions, the MK3 versus MK4 under different components? I have a tube integrated amp and phono stage ad VPI Classic Signature turntable. I’m not really worried about my DAC or CD player. I use them for convenience. My real listening sessions are on vinyl.

Good man. Vinyl rules!

The difference between Mk3 and 4 is small enough either one is better than anything else, but big enough to notice and prefer one over the other, if that makes any sense. Mine are almost entirely Mk4 which makes sense given its a tube amp and turntable system. Mk3 is a bit warmer which since you like tubes and vinyl you might think that is the way to go. But what I found, having compared them both, the sound is more open and extended top to bottom with the fours. I even prefer Mk4 under my CD player and SS sub amps.

There’s BDR Cones under every single thing in my system, including the crossovers and step-down transformer, as you can see in my system pics. Nothing else in my vibration control experience can match BDR in the ability to lower the noise floor and allow you to hear deep into the recording with incredible smooth yet detailed macro and micro-dynamics. Because they are so well balanced you can use more and more like I do and never wind up going too far any one direction.

Look at my system, you will see the progression. 1) start with Cones under everything (this would be my sub amps, crossovers, etc), 2) Add Round Things either under or on top of the Cones (this would be my speakers), 3) add Round Things so its RT, Cone, RT (Verus motor controller), 4) Shelf.

There are exceptions always but its generally better to put Cones under everything before moving on to adding Round Things, and its better to do all with Cones and Round Things rather than decking one thing out with Shelf, Cones, etc. The Miller Carbon turntable is so freaking awesome because .... well just look at it! One Source Shelf has 8X the damping of 8" of granite, and there’s three Source Shelfs worth in the Miller Carbon! The detail I get is insane- because its genuine, natural detail not the hyped up fine grain etch that so often substitutes for detail.




malatu- I was looking reading about BDR cones and it seems like a lot of folks place three of them under a speaker instead of four. I’m going to purchase some and have to ask the question: Why three cones and not four? My floor standing speakers are about 48" tall and the base is only about 10" wide.


People use three for two reasons: three is cheaper than four, and three points define a plane. Cheaper needs no explanation. The plane part, depending on the floor or shelf with four your speaker might rock and need to be shimmed up but with three it never will.

I can tell you however for a fact that four is better. Check it out: https://systems.audiogon.com/systems/8367 There’s four under each Talon Khorus speaker. That speaker comes with some pretty beefy impressive looking spikes. They are on BDR Cones because BDR Cones are light years better than anything else- and I would like to say period but let’s be cautious and just say for the money. In order to get better than anything else period you do like I did and put BDR Round Things under the Cones.

I would use 4 Cones under each speaker.