Reused Item Photos. Misleading?


I noticed today that there are two Ruby 3 carts for sale from different buyers. Each uses the same photographs to seemingly represent the condition and packaging of the item for sale. I think it is misleading practice unless disclosed as a representitive photo of a similer item.

How do members feel about this practice?
eddaytona
I've been considering using this curvy/mint picture

But I know Tabl10s will come after me for diluting his quality image for the sake of a couple of bucks.
Albert, that is nice - really.
I think we have a deal.

I will double box my and bubble wrap it.
I could include the pump but I need it for my Advanced Analog MG-1 Linear Arm.
It is mint and I used it for....? about 1hour a day in the past 3 months. Approximately 100 hours give or take.
I rate it 4 but it looks like a 7.
http://cgim.audiogon.com/i/vs/i/f/1194676943.jpg
Thank goodness Marty joined this thread! I always love it when he talks about his equipment pictures, especially when he gets a rise out of someone who just doesn't get it.
Albert,
That is one dog of an audiophile!
Marty,
If I ever find out where you live...