Reused Item Photos. Misleading?


I noticed today that there are two Ruby 3 carts for sale from different buyers. Each uses the same photographs to seemingly represent the condition and packaging of the item for sale. I think it is misleading practice unless disclosed as a representitive photo of a similer item.

How do members feel about this practice?
eddaytona

Showing 3 responses by albertporter

Marty,

You forgot to include "but I digress" somewhere in the middle of your description.

In case you didn't know, that's a sure fire way to show you're a clever writer.
That was clever of you Marty, accepting my suggestion to use "But I digress..."

Now that I'm convinced you're a clever writer, I want to make an offer on those Bose 901's Danlib1 foolishly mentioned returning.

My bid is $15.500.00 or best offer above that, whatever you say. My jaw hit the floor when I didn't hear those in my system.

Now if only I could find a way to work PRAT into this post.
I've been considering using this curvy/mint picture

But I know Tabl10s will come after me for diluting his quality image for the sake of a couple of bucks.