there is an implicit assumption that that the engineer and the performer want the purchaser of a recording to hear "something". i disagree. the recording is a stement from both engineer and performer, as to what they want to hear. they don't care what you hear, because they have no idea what your stereo system is.
therefore, it is not logical to assume that altering the sound of the recording is not a good idea. it is neither good nor bad. it is just an idea.
i think it is reasonable to expect a listener to "hear" the recording any way he/she desires, without regard to accuracy of transmission.
the problem with this hobby is that there are too many prescrip[tions as to how one should listen to one's recordings and too much dogmatism as too what is good and what is not good.
it's all subjective and a matter of preference.
accuracy still has meaning. however, some audiophiles are not motivated to achieve it.
therefore, it is not logical to assume that altering the sound of the recording is not a good idea. it is neither good nor bad. it is just an idea.
i think it is reasonable to expect a listener to "hear" the recording any way he/she desires, without regard to accuracy of transmission.
the problem with this hobby is that there are too many prescrip[tions as to how one should listen to one's recordings and too much dogmatism as too what is good and what is not good.
it's all subjective and a matter of preference.
accuracy still has meaning. however, some audiophiles are not motivated to achieve it.