I have two Lyra Atlas Lambda cartridges. One is the SL and the other is the Mono. They are identical cartridges in every way, except for the configuration and orientation of the coils. Each cartridge is mounted on a Clearaudio Universal 12" tonearm, using identical tools and geometry. Both arms have the same Siltech DIN/XLR phono cable into a Boulder 1108 phono-stage, and each input is configured identically. The Boulder phono-stage has a mono switch.
If I play a mono record, there is a clear difference between playing it with the mono Atlas cartridge vs playing it with the stereo Atlas cartridge and engaging the phono-stage mono switch. There is just no contest. It’s not even close. The dedicated mono cartridge provides a lower noise floor, with more air and space between instruments, and bigger/deeper soundstage. It’s a lot more lush and natural sounding. It doesn’t even seem like listening to mono. On some mono records my wife thinks it’s really stereo and is surprised by the performance of mono on the system.
If you have a decent collection of mono records – as I do – a dedicated mono cartridge is well worth the effort.
And FWIW: most of my mono records are reissues. There are some that claim it doesn’t matter because all mono records since the mid 60s have been cut with stereo heads. Yes, that’s true, but it isn’t the whole story. The cutting heads are reconfigured for cutting, to make a true mono cut. Kevin Gray has a white paper about that somewhere.

