Also have the REF. 2SE and think it’s fantastic, ![]()
Thoughts on phono stages; Audio Research PH 9 vs. the Ref 3?
Have a ARC 6SE preamp and looking for guidance on these tubed phono stages from the Audiogon Community, pls. Also considering the 160s vs my MC275, McIntosh amp. The 3SE is a huge price point away for me but also curious for any feedback on how stellar is it?
thanks all
- ...
- 8 posts total
The "Low Gain" / MM mode (6H30 stages) was absolutely stellar; still probably the best I’ve heard / owned. The "High Gain" mode was indeed very good sounding, but not without issues and probably not quite in line with this (very high) price point. Feels like some noise shielding and grounding optimization was missed. I fixed that by using Low Gain with a SUT. |
Thanks for the tip. Ref3 is a great phono |
Thanks so much. I'm working towards getting a REF 3 SE. What is an SUT in the low gain ? Wonder if that's an issue with the 3 SE? I asked a dealer if the PH 9 with be updated or replaced. 2016 released.He said he reached out to ARC and the answer is No, not for a few years. They think the PH9 sounds better than the Ref 3. |
I have a REF 2 SE phono > REF 5SE > imo HRS Nimbus or better isolation, and a damper block is well rewarded.‘I’ve heard both the 6se and Phono 3’at length but not a PH9.. interesting they think it sounds better but isn’t deserving of REF designation…, |
- 8 posts total

