AI Within Threads - AI Section

It would be nice to know which search is more reliable, i.e. I was using google, then ChatGPT, my friend told me about it, and he found it to be very good.

Because of popup ads on this site, I changed to Brave Browser (they are GONE), and I just put a question in, and Brave AI answers.

I ALWAYS identify if I am posting AI info, and use "  .."

//////////////////////////////////////

Some people have better knowledge of how to phrase questions, follow-up questions, perhaps posting some help for that would be helpful also.

///////////////////////////////////

My photography forum is struggling with people posting photos enhanced with AI, it's going to take some time to sort out sensible rules,

and, I think a lot of people are going to have to find other ways to make a living.

It would be nice to know if your watching a real person or an AI....

From the initial responses, including my own, there is good reasoning behind consolidating AI information into its own Topic Section.

With the intent that less usage ends up in a typical Topic Section.

This is not a challenge to anybody already using the available info; many who post are quite content with sharing the information source.

My take is the information used in a Thread with many posts can become an info that has steered the thread, and is an influence on later-in-thread content. Later visitors to the thread may not read content prior to AI being introduced and 'possibly'?, influencing the thread.

Indirectly, AI 'can'?, be the content that is the influence of another's decisions being made. 

I must ask, because I am unsure. What is being stated as a necessary course of action? Is that AI is distrusted and should be isolated or that somehow AI is conceptualising something and therefore needs isolating. I would ask how?. The AI question appears often, but to be frank other than AI's current  frailties which will not last for long, I see no task