Matrix Audio SI-1 Network Isolator


A recent discussion on the value of network switches by @fire_water  rekindled my curiosity about revisiting optical isolation. As someone who leans toward minimalism, a single-box optical isolator was the prime draw and to see if newer devices offering further improvements over my existing optical isolator. 

For context, my front end is built around 3 chassis Merging Technologies +PLAYER / Merging Technologies +CLOCK / Merging Technologies +POWER which is already extremely low noise, highly resolving, and very “studio honest,” reflecting its roots in professional high-resolution recording and editing. It doesn’t gloss over upstream shortcomings—if anything, it exposes them. As a result, any change ahead of it is easy to evaluate.

To be fair, my existing Telegärtner OPTO BRIDGE 1000M already performs very well—delivering a cleaner background, lower noise, and solid isolation. No complaints there except it is powered by an external LHY linear power supply…extra cables plus more real estate :-) 

So how does the SI-1 compare?

In my system, the SI-1 builds on Opto Bridge foundation with:

  • A further reduction in noise floor
  • Greater image density and depth
  • Improved microdynamics and sense of flow
  • A more natural tonal presentation without sacrificing resolution

The biggest difference?
With the Telegärtner, the presentation was clean and relaxed.
With the SI-1, it becomes more organic, fluid, and musically coherent.

My take:
Telegärtner = excellent isolation
SI-1 = isolation plus signal refinement (regeneration) by breaking ground noise and eliminating EMI/RFI riding on Ethernet. 

In a highly resolving system, that extra layer makes a meaningful difference.

Here’s the rub guys, not every system truly benefits from an audiophile Ethernet switch or an overbuilt router. That’s been my experience after introducing optical isolation into the chain. Once I did, even a high-quality switch like the Telegärtner M12 Gold Switch became redundant.

IMHO, optical isolation is essential for any serious streaming setup. The SI-1 doesn’t feel like a tweak, it comes across as a final-stage refinement, allowing your streamer to perform at its full potential and reveal what it’s genuinely capable of.

Here is my signal chain, 

Apple Router →  SI-1 → Streamer (Merging stack) using a pair of FTA Métis LAN cables. 

https://www.matrix-digi.com/product/125/SI-1

lalitk

@mammothguy54 

Thank you for your grounded impression of the SI-1. Your impressions further solidify what I experienced after installing the SI-1 in my system. The Si-1 effectively removes that last layer of edge without trading away resolution. There are so many devices that claim to reduce or remove certain artifacts, but when a device gets that balance right; where detail stays intact yet no longer sounds etched, it usually shows up exactly the way you described: more ease, better separation, and that “black background” effect that lets instruments occupy space more naturally.

In my experience, the most interesting improvements in well-resolved systems are rarely dramatic. They’re cumulative, and they change how long you want to listen rather than how strongly you react in the first five minutes.

I had a gentleman visit my man cave yesterday to purchase the REL Carbon Limited subs, and he was genuinely taken aback by what he heard. He put on a couple of his favorite tracks and just sat there in disbelief at how detailed everything was, yet completely free of that familiar digital glare he’s used to hearing in most modern setups. It wasn’t about added sparkle or hype; it was the same sense you’re describing: ease, clarity, and music simply unfolding naturally in the room. That reaction alone said a lot about how well a device like the SI-1 can work as a final-stage refinement. 

What Ethernet cables and powercord you’re using with SI-1?  I think it will be helpful for the readers to know how everything matters in a well appointed systems. 

@lalitk Thank you for your very nice reply.  To answer your question, I am using Audioquest Tornado, Source for the power cord and Audioquest Cinnamon Ethernet cables from router to Si-1 and from Si-1 to streamer. 

Indeed, everything does matter.  Many years ago, with an Accuphase component stack, I got Audioquest signal cables.  Emerald was the model back then and this was during the very early years of Audioquest, 1988.  I replaced Discwasher Gold Ends signal cables with the Emerald cables.  I was stunned at the difference.  It was not subtle at all.  I have been a complete Audioquest customer since.

@mammothguy54 thank you for a very thoughtful and informative review. 
I’m focusing on a phono stage upgrade at the moment but the SI-1 is on my list and I will definitely be buying it in the near future. 

Sidebar conversation related to the isolation of this type. A year ago I bought an LHY EFI which is highly similar to the SI-1 for my 2 ch system downstairs.. This April I replaced it with an LHY SW10Pro switch and it was no longer needed. (Yes the LHY Switch is really nice) We also switched from our Spectrum Cable boxes to the Xumo Stream Box so I placed the LHY EFI just before the Xumo with a very nice DH Labs Reunion cable connecting them. Well it helped! Visually I am not sure of any big changes but the audio from our modest HT setup  is now so much clearer, we have set the volume on our Yamaha HT AV receiver far lower and everything sounds better. SO, these things may help in that arena too if you care to try it out. 

@fthompson251 Thank you very much for your comments and information.  I looked into the SW10Pro just now and it is one excellent unit.  I just made the investment into the Si-1 and will live with it.  At some point I will examine potential changes in this arena, as time passes and technology may change a bit.  It seems the SW10Pro is at the leading edge of that technology.  But I did just make the first leap.  The analog rabbit hole I have been living with for so many years found a partner...the digital rabbit hole.  Darn it!!!