Should AI generated posts be banned or otherwise regulated?

@kerrybh wrote:

I suspect most folks are pretty good at skipping long, AI generated stuff.

True, but why do we have to be bothered? It's like saying, most folks are pretty good at sidestepping vomit puddles and dog turds 😃

@devinplombier 😀i get your point, so delicately made. I’d be perfectly happy to not deal with these long AI messages but some of our colleagues seem to like them and a ban seems a little harsh.

Don't ban AI, but maybe , it should be identified so that the reader or user can make the decision to cross check if the answer doesn't sound right or just make sure it's accurate. Mistakes have been made, but it gets better as it goes.

Some AGRs are quite interesting.

• ASR bans people from saying “DACs sound different”;
• AGR does not ban Amir from claiming that “all DACs sound the same” here
• some AGRs want to ban AI because it sometimes gets things wrong just like these AGRs themselves.

Isn’t that funny?  Is there something wrong with AI or these AGRs?

AI .. in the versions we generally have are little more than advertising polls, to be frank I really wonder about the intellect of people using the information.

Wow. You should really do a bit of research.

You don’t have to be "pro-AI’ but you should at least know what it is and can do. 

And what is an "AGR", mentioned just below? Did AI write that or is it a  typo repeated by a human?