I was most unimpressed with Sennheiser headphones I heard a couple of years ago, but I just put it down to me. Can you elaborate a bit more, please?
HD800 sounds sterile, dry, lean, bright & uninvolving to me. HD600 and 650 are musical and warm (less so for HD600). HD800 is technically better (more detailed) than HD6**, but not by much - and the latter are far more musical. Furthermore, electrostats spank HD800 in detail & low distortion, plus they’re more musical to boot. So I never "got" where this headphone fits in.
I was looking forward to Sennheiser’s long anticipated successor to HD650, and when I heard HD800 it was like a cold wet blanket. Adding insult to injury, its design was a shameless & blatant ripoff of Sony’s prior SA3000, SA5000, and Qualia 010 models. Those Sonys were TRULY a novel design upon release, but quickly ended as commercial failures (utterly). However flawed (and they were - weird midrange), they were also quirky & beautiful in ways the HD800 can’t touch IMO. HD800 fixed the Sonys’ midrange a bit (not all the way) and lost ALL the magic that made them special in the process - an exquisitely engineered mediocrity. Also Sony’s build quality and materials were far better (SA5000 and 010). It was especially galling that when Sennheiser released HD650 as its then new flagship (2003), they made a big deal about voicing it for warmth and natural musicality, more than its predecessor HD600. Then with HD800 they went totally the OPPOSITE direction and then some.
The HD800S revision supposedly corrects the brightness, but I was long past the point of caring when it was released. A couple years ago I got to borrow a HD820, and its sound quality is embarrassing for its cost. Perfect example of a designer being too clever for his own good, with the concave glass windows (wtf).
You can amp the HD800 into oblivion and get it to start sounding natural again, but you can also do this with 650 and I’ll still like its result better.
Thank you for allowing me to once again express how much I hate HD800 lol