Ansuz C3 vs JPS Aluminata


Has anyone had experience comparing Ansuz C3 (third gen.) cabling with JPS Aluminata?  I currently have a loom (pc's, ic's, speaker) of the Aluminata throughout and considering reaching out to audition a loom of the Ansuz C3, if possible.  They come at a considerable jump in cost, however.  Thank you to any who might be able to offer feedback.  

mbump

I have listened to them both and own(ed) the JPS Aluminata and Super Aluminata's. In my opinion,  based on the sonics and system that I have - I would stay with the JPS. Sometimes the JPS can be tough to sell on the used market as the '' technology is old '' as I have been told, still they still are fantastic sounding cables no matter '' how old '' the technology is.      

Interesting - Thank you for your perspective.  I've always appreciated the low freq. boost the Aluminata provide and otherwise not interested in moving in a different cabling direction.  However, I recently had a variety of Ansuz cabling in for a Borresen review, and really enjoyed the C3 Speakz that came with the package.  Seemed to improve transient speed, reduce noise floor to practically nothing, crisp definition of sources, enhanced imaging, etc.  A clear difference from my Aluminata speaker cables, IMHO, though perhaps a bit less rich in lower frequencies.  Just curious of others' experiences.