How important is low W & F performance anyway?

@billstevenson 

@phoenixengr 

"@faustuss There is no question concerning Bill’s credibility.  It makes no difference whether you find his information useful or not.  It certainly comports well with my experience and with what I have been learning since acquiring AnalogMagic.  Take it for what it is worth."

It did state early on that W & F is only going to be as good as what's on the master tape and what's introduced by the cutting lathe. So, this whole topic is rather mute.

If the OP wants to be disingenuous and insult the other posters in this thread's intelligence including yours it's his prerogative.

Am I supposed to be impressed that you spent good money on a software package called "AnalogMagik" when using tried and true methods of calibrating your equipment is more than adequate, I'm not!

"As I said, the choice is yours.  It hard to imagine how I could possibly care less either way."

Truthfully, I won't waste anymore of my time!

I agree with what's been said about listening to the LP/arm/cart as in the end, that is what we are doing.  But as an engineer working on a motor controller, my job was to make that contribution as small as possible.

Also agree that measuring it using an LP (and retail products) can give misleading results as Thigpen posited;  that's why I also chose to look at the encoders on these tables as it eliminated most of those issues.

This is the polar plot of DD1 with a 40Hz BW;  W&F is 0.16%, still much worse than their spec of 0.008%:

This is the same .wav file but with a 100Hz BW:

I

If you count the peaks there are exactly 20 from 0-45° or 225mS;  that yields a modulating signal at 88.88Hz or 160 pulses in 1.8S (360° or 1 rev).  This correlates with the 160 poles of the magnetic encoder they use.

This is the readout of the development software used to program and tune the controller.  The upper right window shows speed error and there are ~13 peaks in 0.147 seconds corresponding to ~88.88Hz:

This is the readout of the same .wav file taken with Multi-Instrument software:

T

The reading is higher than the polar plot software, but I believe their BW is also 200Hz.