"You spent how much on that cartridge?"


Should there be a ratio of the amount of vinyl to the cost of your playback system? A recent thread implied that you should not have a nice rig unless you own a lot of albums. Almost like one does not qualify.

I want to enjoy listening to the relative-to-some few that I own without compromising. I agree that if you have little to no familiarity with the format, you should enter gingerly. But once you've decided you like it, why accept mediocrity?

 

 

tcutter

Let's not underestimate the value (monetary and sonically) of a good tonearm. No point putting an expensive cart on a cheap tonearm. It will not sound much better. It could even sound worse because of the mismatch.

I think it’s funny that people want to opine on such qualitative matters such as how much you should spend on a cart or how many albums one should own or what percentage of the total system spend should be on a certain component. Guidelines are great, but beyond that you do you! If you have 1 album and a $30k vinyl system and you have the money and enjoy it that is awesome. If you have 5,000 albums and a suitcase player you like listening to on your Ford F150 tailgate go for it!  

tcutter-

by the looks of your room/graphs, you did your homework-bravo.

Great to see the ol VPI doin its thing. 

Obvious you have the means to acquire a newer spinner, but I get it.

With the arm/speed management and cart system I'm sure it's not that far off from something more costly.👍

To be fair a modern SOTA vs a fully depreciated Sapphire or say a Denon 75/80/3000 is not a fair economic fight… but I’ve done and still do the same sonic value experiment and trade off.,  see my North system w constrained layer 2 arm 75 on HRS isolation w Ortofon / Triplaner / Dynavector arms and carts from Dyna / Denon / Grace / Kuzma and Koetsu…

it is all great ratio fun….