"You spent how much on that cartridge?"


Should there be a ratio of the amount of vinyl to the cost of your playback system? A recent thread implied that you should not have a nice rig unless you own a lot of albums. Almost like one does not qualify.

I want to enjoy listening to the relative-to-some few that I own without compromising. I agree that if you have little to no familiarity with the format, you should enter gingerly. But once you've decided you like it, why accept mediocrity?

 

 

tcutter

Ratios are useful tools in finding relationships and forecasting future results. It is not useful in high-end audio as each individual has unique disposable incomes, unique audio budgets, and unique personal sonic preferences. 

Fascinating subject.  I am thinking about my VPI HW19 MKIII, bought new in 1986, but now fitted with an SME 3009 Series II Improved, which is even older.  Oh well, I am playing mostly old records anyway.  Having a lot of fun too.  As I sort thru these records and enter them into the Discogs database most of them aren't worth much either.  Maybe I should hang my head in shame.  I am also mostly using MM cartridges too.  Not much to brag about.

a formula is not a bad thing when upgrading and you are a beginner.

Luckily I never had the budget to have to limit my upgrade by a formula, I always went all out and spent 100s of dollars!

I am not a cartridge man but I suppose different music can sound best with different cartridges. 30 would be too many for me but five might not.

I had this kind of experience with RCA cables when I had solid state phono stage. Now with VAC's onboard MM phono stage I don't need additional cables at all. Nottingham Space Arm's wiring goes straight into the amp.

Does it make sense to put a $15K cartridge on a $2k turntable? I haven’t heard of anyone who has tried that.  The other way around, vice-versa, in reverse, might be better.  Unless that’s backwards.