Too Much Time On Their Hands

I think the n number were all on 🍄.  In my usaid grant I had a mouse ,a cat chasing the mouse and the dog chasing them all with ofc and cc wired them together running dagostino,burmester and focal speakers. No difference in sound d quality through any animal.no animals were harmed in. The study.however we threw out the end were it was a cat and mouse game.the mouse lost.this had a double blind large n value with 95%  on p value confidence. The title was statics and darn lies.enjoy the music ,wires and pets.no pets were harmed in this research however the cat had a perpetual smile as we could not find the mouse to pay it.

 This is the 3rd posting of this ...

I think the n number were all on 🍄.

That mushroom is the Fly Agaric, a hallucinogenic variety.

I have them growing in my yard.

Which would explain most of my posts...

Many, many listening experiments fail to note subtle differences.  There are just too many variables involved that I think get disregarded.

My take is that most listening experiments are done with short audio samples for a relatively short duration, often on a system and room the listeners are not familiar with.  Add the element of pressure that a listener is supposed to hear a difference at that moment, and the whole experience ends up very different than long term (days and weeks) listening to a good system that you’re familiar with in the comfort of your own home.  .