oops, sorry, that was a bad last takeaway, because you’re talking about the Mini, obviously not the much more expensive U2x. The mini almost certainly has higher levels of jitter than the U2x, snd while I would guess that it’s not substantially higher than the Volumio, I absolutely do not know that for sure.
SQ Comparison of 3 streamers
Do you concur these assessments if you were the owner?
SQ Comparison: Eversolo T8 vs Innuos Zen Mk3 vs Volumio Rivo Plus
| Feature | Eversolo T8 | Innuos Zen Mk3 | Volumio Rivo Plus |
| Tonal Balance | Slightly warm, musical | Neutral, reference | Neutral-warm, slightly lush |
| Midrange | Lush, expressive | Transparent, accurate | Smooth and natural, slightly forward |
| Bass | Tight, controlled | Tight, maybe leaner | Solid, full-bodied, a bit warmer than Zen |
| Detail Retrieval | High, smooth | Very high, analytical | High, clear |
| Dynamics | Natural, engaging | Precise, accurate | Great, rhythmic and musical |
| Soundstage Imaging | Spacious, slightly forward; enveloping | Very wide and deep; highly precise | Wide, deep, more relaxed |
| Overall Impression | Engaging & musical | Neutral & resolving | Balanced, musical, and slightly “polished” |
- ...
- 106 posts total
I don’t know about Roon since I don’t use it. But between the native app and QC (for example), I don’t hear any tonal shift. Did you? What I do hear, as noted previously, is that QC sounds a bit better to my ears than all the native apps for all brands of streamers I own, except Volumio. I’m kind of hoping someone has a good explanation for it. The internal signal processing of different apps seems to make a difference. |
Thank you for the information, @mdalton. Rivo plus has improved MEMS-based (no matter what that is) clock over the standard CO in Rivo, which should provide lower jitter, better frequency stability, and less susceptibility to temperature variation and ageing. I am not surprised if the measurements can further approach to $10k U2x. That is certainly reflected in the listening experience. |
Not to beat a dead horse, but jitter is largely a solved problem for most serious companies, so while I think it’s great that the Rivo+ improved the clock and lowered jitter further, I am virtually certain any differences in sound between Rivo and Rivo + that either of us might hear is not due to lowered jitter. No idea about the other factors however, which is why I think this is an area of the industry where marketing hype can really get out of control. We haven’t even talked about your DAC btw, which is multiples more important to the sound you hear. Look at the numbers for the Mytek vs. the iFi - 0 added jitter from any streamer, which probably means signal is reclocked. My personal view is that signal to noise ratio, which is really easy to measure, is far more important to what you’re hearing than jitter, and one could do the exact same thing there as Paul Miller does for jitter, i.e., before and after SNR ratios to see how much noise is added by a streamer. Miller has actually done some of that, but only episodically, so you can’t put together a comprehensive table across streamers and dacs. A lost opportunity in my view. |
@lanx0003 I no longer have the Aurender N200, the last streamer with native software I used to compare Roon, native Conductor and Qobuz connect. I don’t have experience with any of the streamers you listed. However, when comparing native app to Q Connect I heard more refined presentation from the Aurender’s conductor app. Q Connect has a slightly raw and more in your face type of presentation. Works great with rock music. I have a Meitner MA3i DAC now that has a built in network card that makes it a Roon endpoint and allows for Qobuz and Tidal connect. I use Roon 90% of the time but mix in Qobuz and Tidal connect as well. This setup eliminated the N200. |
- 106 posts total

